Robinson v. DreamCloud Brand LLC
| Danielle Robinson |
| DreamCloud Brand LLC and DreamCloud Brand LLC a Delaware Corporation doing business as Resident Home, LLC |
| 3:2020cv01401 |
| February 25, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Joseph C Spero |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. § 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Resident Home, LLC.. (Cosmopulos, William) (Filed on 3/31/2020) |
| Filing 17 CLERK'S NOTICE CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) Case Management Statement due by 7/31/2020. Initial Case Management Conference re-set for 8/7/2020 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom F, 15th Floor. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2020) |
Filing 16
Order, signed 3/30/2020, by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero granting #10 Stipulation to Stay Case and Continue Responsive Pleading Deadline Pending Mediation. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2020)
|
| Filing 15 *PLEASE DISREGARD. FILED IN ERROR. SEE NEXT ENTRY* Order, signed 3/30/2020, by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero granting #10 Stipulation to Stay Case and Continue Responsive Pleading Deadline Pending Mediation.(klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2020) Modified on 3/30/2020 (klhS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 14 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Defendant shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (Party/parties were also notified via telephone or email.) Consent/Declination due by 4/13/2020. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2020) |
| Re: ECF #16 CASE REFERRED to Private ADR. (cmf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2020) |
| #Electronic filing error. Incorrect PDF attached. [err201]Corrected by Clerk's Office. No further action is necessary. Re: #15 Order on Stipulation, Order is not dated or si gned. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2020) |
| Filing 13 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Resident Home, LLC Defendant Resident Home, LLC's Corporate Disclosure Statement (Cosmopulos, William) (Filed on 3/27/2020) |
| Filing 12 Certificate of Interested Entities by Resident Home, LLC identifying Other Affiliate DreamCloud Holdings LLC. (Cosmopulos, William) (Filed on 3/27/2020) Modified on 3/30/2020 (mclS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Sophia Behnia on behalf of Defendant RESIDENT HOME, LLC (Behnia, Sophia) (Filed on 3/27/2020) |
| Filing 10 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Stay Case and Continue Responsive Pleading Deadline Pending Mediation filed by DreamCloud Brand LLC. (Cosmopulos, William) (Filed on 3/26/2020) |
| Filing 9 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options of Plaintiff Danielle Robinson (Kaufmann, Aaron) (Filed on 3/11/2020) |
| #Electronic filing error. Incorrect event used. The correct event is SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. [err101]Corrected by Clerk's Office. No further action is necessary. R e: #8 Certificate of Service filed by Danielle Robinson (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2020) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED by Danielle Robinson. DreamCloud Brand LLC served on 3/5/20, answer due 3/26/20. (Kaufmann, Aaron) (Filed on 3/10/2020) Modified on 3/11/2020 (mclS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Danielle Robinson.. (Baig, Afroz) (Filed on 3/9/2020) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to DreamCloud Brand LLC. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/5/2020) |
| Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Pilot Program for Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 5/ 22/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/29/2020 02:00 PM. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/26/2020) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Afroz Baig for Plaintiff (Baig, Afroz) (Filed on 2/25/2020) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 3/10/2020. (ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2020) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Kaufmann, Aaron) (Filed on 2/25/2020) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DreamCloud Brand LLC ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-14215405.). Filed byDanielle Robinson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kaufmann, Aaron) (Filed on 2/25/2020) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
