Sepulveda v. Reynoso et al
Plaintiff: Richard Sepulveda
Defendant: Valentin Reynoso, Martha Leticia Reynoso, Valentin Reynoso individually doing business as San Gaspar Restaurant and Martha Leticia Reynoso individually doing business as San Gaspar Restaurant
Case Number: 3:2020cv01484
Filed: February 27, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Thomas S Hixson
Nature of Suit: American with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 23, 2020 Filing 10 MOTION for Entry of Default filed by Richard Sepulveda. (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Mac Bride, Richard) (Filed on 4/23/2020)
April 1, 2020 Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Richard Sepulveda.. (Mac Bride, Richard) (Filed on 4/1/2020)
March 27, 2020 Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint byMartha Leticia Reynoso. (elyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2020) Modified on 4/8/2020 (elyS, COURT STAFF).
March 18, 2020 #Electronic filing error. E-filer should put in the service date for defendants. Corrected by Clerk's Office. No further action is necessary. Re: #7 Summons Returned Executed, filed by Richard Sepulveda (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/18/2020)
March 17, 2020 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Richard Sepulveda. Valentin Reynoso served on 3/9/20, answer due 3/30/20 ; Martha Leticia Reynoso served on 3/9/20, answer due 3/30/20. (Mac Bride, Richard) (Filed on 3/17/2020) Modified on 3/18/2020 (mclS, COURT STAFF).
February 28, 2020 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Martha Leticia Reynoso, Valentin Reynoso. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2020)
February 28, 2020 Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order for Cases Asserting Denial of Right of Access under Americans with Disabilities Act. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2020)
February 28, 2020 Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 3/13/2020. (cfeS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2020)
February 28, 2020 Filing 3 POSTED IN ERROR, PLS SEE DOCKET 4 ***Case assigned Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 3/13/2020. (cfeS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2020) Modified on 2/28/2020 (cfeS, COURT STAFF).
February 27, 2020 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Mac Bride, Richard) (Filed on 2/27/2020)
February 27, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-14227950.). Filed byRichard Sepulveda. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Mac Bride, Richard) (Filed on 2/27/2020)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sepulveda v. Reynoso et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Valentin Reynoso
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Martha Leticia Reynoso
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Valentin Reynoso individually doing business as San Gaspar Restaurant
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Martha Leticia Reynoso individually doing business as San Gaspar Restaurant
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard Sepulveda
Represented By: Richard Allen Mac Bride
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?