Lipton v. Johnson & Johnson et al
Plaintiff: Lipton and Diana Lynn Lipton
Defendant: Johnson & Johnson and Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.
Case Number: 3:2020cv01841
Filed: March 16, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: James Donato
Referring Judge: Joseph C Spero
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER by MDL Panel Transferring Case to the District of New Jersey (MDL 2738 CTO-206). (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/8/2020)
April 8, 2020 Case electronically transferred to the District of New Jersey. New case number - 3:20-cv-01841. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/8/2020)
March 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 13 CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Case Management Conference set for 6/25/2020 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 11, 19th Floor. Case Management Statement due by 6/18/2020. Signed by Judge James Donato on 3/20/2020. (lrcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/20/2020)
March 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER, Case Reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 t Judge James Donato for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero no longer assigned to the case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by The Clerk on 3/19/20. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/19/2020)
March 19, 2020 Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/19/2020) Modified on 3/19/2020 (klhS, COURT STAFF).
March 19, 2020 Filing 10 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc... (Weissenberger, Emily) (Filed on 3/19/2020)
March 18, 2020 Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs/Defendants shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (Party/parties were also notified via telephone or email.) Consent/Declination due by 3/25/2020. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/18/2020)
March 17, 2020 Filing 8 MOTION to Stay All Proceedings filed by Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 4/24/2020 09:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom F, 15th Floor before Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. Responses due by 3/31/2020. Replies due by 4/7/2020. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum In Support of Motion to Stay All Proceedings, #2 Proposed Order)(Weissenberger, Emily) (Filed on 3/17/2020)
March 16, 2020 Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. re #6 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines (Weissenberger, Emily) (Filed on 3/16/2020)
March 16, 2020 Filing 6 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 6/12/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 6/19/2020 02:00 PM. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/16/2020)
March 16, 2020 Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) byJohnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.. (Weissenberger, Emily) (Filed on 3/16/2020)
March 16, 2020 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. re 3 Case Assigned by Intake,,, #1 Notice of Removal, #2 Certificate of Interested Entities (Weissenberger, Emily) (Filed on 3/16/2020)
March 16, 2020 Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 3/30/2020. (ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/16/2020)
March 16, 2020 Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. (Weissenberger, Emily) (Filed on 3/16/2020)
March 16, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Francisco Superior. Their case number is CGC-19-581384. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0971-14282172). Filed byJohnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., Johnson & Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Declaration of Emily Weissenberger in Support of Removal, #3 Copy of Complaint attached - Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B)(Weissenberger, Emily) (Filed on 3/16/2020) Modified on 3/16/2020 (mclS, COURT STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lipton v. Johnson & Johnson et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Johnson & Johnson
Represented By: Emily Weissenberger
Represented By: Michael F. Healy
Represented By: Michael Carl Zellers
Represented By: Amanda Villalobos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.
Represented By: Emily Weissenberger
Represented By: Michael F. Healy
Represented By: Michael Carl Zellers
Represented By: Amanda Villalobos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lipton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Diana Lynn Lipton
Represented By: Walter Herbert Walker, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?