Stolipher v. Monsanto Company
| Nancy Stolipher |
| Monsanto Company |
| 3:2020cv02297 |
| April 4, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Vince Chhabria |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Monsanto Company identifying Other Affiliate Bayer AG for Monsanto Company. (Hollingsworth, Joe) (Filed on 4/14/2020) |
| Filing 7 Certificate of Interested Entities by Monsanto Company identifying Other Affiliate Bayer AG for Monsanto Company. (Hollingsworth, Joe) (Filed on 4/14/2020) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint with jury demand byMonsanto Company. (Hollingsworth, Joe) (Filed on 4/14/2020) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Rebecca Laine Fredona (Fredona, Rebecca) (Filed on 4/9/2020) |
| MEMBER CASE OPENED: re 3:16-md-02741-VC; Northern District of West Virginia, 3:20-cv-00033-GMG Stolipher v. Monsanto Company, opened in California Northern District as 3:20-cv-2297 VC pursuant to Conditional Transfer Order 197 cc: JPMDL (gbaS-adi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/6/2020) |
| Filing 4 Case transferred in from District of West Virginia Northern; Case Number 3:20-cv-00033. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| Filing 3 CERTIFIED COPY OF JPML CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER FINALIZED (CTO-197) - 8 action(s) re: pldg. (1 in FLM/6:20-cv-00468, 1 in GAM/3:20-cv-00014, 1 in IAS/4:20-cv-00096, 1693 in MDL No. 2741, 1 in ND/3:20-cv-00027, 1 in TXE/6:20-cv-00111, 1 in WVN/3:20-cv-00029, 1 in WVN/3:20-cv-00030, 1 in WVN/3:20-cv-00033) Inasmuch as no objection is pending at this time, the stay is lifted. Signed by Clerk of the Panel John W. Nichols on 3/30/2020. Associated Cases: MDL No. 2741, FLM/6:20-cv-00468, GAM/3:20-cv-00014, IAS/4:20-cv-00096, ND/3:20-cv-00027, TXE/6:20-cv-00111, WVN/3:20-cv-00029, WVN/3:20-cv-00030, WVN/3:20-cv-00033.(cmd) |
| Case transferred to District of California Northern re MDL 2741. Entire Case file electronically transmitted. (cmd) |
| Filing 2 VERIFICATION OF ATTORNEY ADMISSION as to Ken Moll. (tlg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Monsanto Company, filed by Nancy Stolipher. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). Filing Fee $400 - Receipt #0424-2995355(tlg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Stolipher v. Monsanto Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Nancy Stolipher | |
| Represented By: | Ken Moll |
| Represented By: | Stephen G. Skinner |
| Represented By: | Rebecca Laine Fredona |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Monsanto Company | |
| Represented By: | Eric G. Lasker |
| Represented By: | Joe G. Hollingsworth |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
