Ferrantino v. Oakland Unified School District
| Anthony Ferrantino |
| Oakland Unified School District |
| 3:2020cv02816 |
| April 23, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Alex G Tse |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Anthony Ferrantino.. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/18/2020) |
| Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF Re: Consent or Declination. Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 6/18/2020. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/4/2020)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Oakland Unified School District. (Attachments: #1 USM 285)(fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/30/2020) |
Filing 4
ORDER Granting Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse: granting #3 Application. The deputy clerk hereby certifies that on 4/30/2020 a copy of this order was served by sending it via first-class mail to the address of each non-CM/ECF user listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing. (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/29/2020) Modified on 4/29/2020 (shyS, COURT STAFF).
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Anthony Ferrantino. (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/23/2020) |
| Filing 2 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 7/17/202 0. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/24/2020 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom A, 15th Floor. (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/23/2020) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Oakland Unified School District. Filed byAnthony Ferrantino. Consent/Declination due by 5/7/2020. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/23/2020) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ferrantino v. Oakland Unified School District | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Anthony Ferrantino | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Oakland Unified School District | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
