Eagle County v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
Eagle County |
Nu Mark Innovations Ltd, Altria Client Services LLC, Altria Group Distribution Company, Altria Group Inc., Juul Labs Inc., Nu Mark LLC, Eonsmoke LLC and Pax Labs Inc |
3:2020cv02907 |
April 28, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
William H Orrick |
Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
18 U.S.C. § 1961 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Eagle County. Nu Mark LLC served on 5/27/2020, answer due 6/17/2020. (Kawamoto, Dean) (Filed on 5/28/2020) |
Filing 20 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Eagle County. Nu Mark Innovations Ltd served on 5/27/2020, answer due 6/17/2020. (Kawamoto, Dean) (Filed on 5/28/2020) |
Filing 19 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Eagle County. Juul Labs Inc. served on 5/27/2020, answer due 6/17/2020. (Kawamoto, Dean) (Filed on 5/28/2020) |
Filing 18 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Eagle County. Altria Group Inc. served on 5/27/2020, answer due 6/17/2020. (Kawamoto, Dean) (Filed on 5/28/2020) |
Filing 17 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Eagle County. Altria Group Distribution Company served on 5/27/2020, answer due 6/17/2020. (Kawamoto, Dean) (Filed on 5/28/2020) |
Filing 16 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Eagle County. Altria Client Services LLC served on 5/27/2020, answer due 6/17/2020. (Kawamoto, Dean) (Filed on 5/28/2020) |
MEMBER CASE OPENED: re 3:19-md-02913-WHO; Eagle County v. Juul Labs, Inc., et al, Opened in California Northern District as 3:20-cv-2907 WHO cc: JPMDL (gbaS-adi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2020) |
Filing 15 Case transferred in from District of Colorado; Case Number 1:20-cv-00901. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
Filing 14 CERTIFIED COPY OF CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-28) from the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation pursuant to 28 USC 1407, transferring from the District of Colorado, 20-cv-00901 CMA-GPG, to the Northern District of California, to become part of MDL 2913, by Clerk on 4/23/2020. (evana, ) |
Filing 13 CASE REASSIGNED Pursuant to 11 Order. This case is reassigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. All future pleadings should be designated as 20-cv-00901-CMA-GPG. (Text Only Entry) (tsher, ) |
Filing 12 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 4/7/2020. The Scheduling Conference set for 6/3/2020 is VACATED. (tsher, ) |
Filing 11 ORDER: This matter has its factual nexus in Eagle County. According to the Court's Revised Jury Plan for Random Jury Selection, this case is therefore properly designated for Jury Division 3. Because the jury will be drawn from that Division, it is appropriate that the case be managed, for pretrial purposes, by Magistrate Judge Gallagher in Grand Junction. Accordingly, pursuant to D.C. Colo. L. Civ. R. 40.1(a), and as approved by the Chief Judge of the Court, the undersigned directs that the Clerk of the Court reassign this action to Magistrate Judge Gallagher as the referral judge. All further pleadings in this case shall reflect the case number of 20-cv-00901-CMA-GPG. SO ORDERED by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 4/6/2020. Text Only Entry (cmalc1) |
Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 4/6/2020. Scheduling Conference set for 6/3/2020 10:30 AM in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. (tsher, ) |
Filing 9 ORDER granting #3 Plaintiff's Motion to Restrict Access to Unredacted Complaint. ECF Doc. # 4 shall have a Level 1 Restriction. SO ORDERED by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 4/6/2020. Text Only Entry (cmalc1) |
Filing 8 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Magistrate Judge Hegarty is designated to conduct NDISPO proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b). The parties should expect to be given a firm trial setting that is 90 to 120 days from the date of the final pretrial conference and should be available for trial accordingly. Court-sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, the Court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. SO ORDERED by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 4/6/2020. Text Only Entry (cmalc1) |
Filing 7 SUMMONSES issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (cmadr, ) |
Filing 6 Case assigned to Judge Christine M. Arguello and drawn to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Text Only Entry (cmadr, ) |
Filing 5 Filing fee: $ 400.00, receipt number COX094597. (alave, ) |
Filing 4 RESTRICTED DOCUMENT - Level 1: Unredacted copy of #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Eagle County.. (Kawamoto, Dean) Modified to add document title on 4/2/2020 (cmadr, ). |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Restrict by Plaintiff Eagle County. (Kawamoto, Dean) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE ASSOCIATION Notice of Related Cases by Dean Noburu Kawamoto on behalf of Eagle County (Kawamoto, Dean) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Altria Client Services LLC, Altria Group Distribution Company, Altria Group, Inc., Eonsmoke LLC, JUUL Labs, Inc., Nu Mark Innovations, Ltd., Nu Mark LLC (Filing fee $ 400).Attorney Dean Noburu Kawamoto added to party Eagle County(pty:pla), filed by Eagle County. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Kawamoto, Dean) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.