Phillips et al v. Monsanto Company
Mark Phillips and Debra Phillips |
Monsanto Company |
3:2020cv03065 |
May 5, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Vince Chhabria |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand byMonsanto Company. (Hollingsworth, Joe) (Filed on 5/18/2020) |
Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Monsanto Company identifying Other Affiliate Bayer AG for Monsanto Company. (Hollingsworth, Joe) (Filed on 5/18/2020) |
Filing 7 Certificate of Interested Entities by Monsanto Company identifying Other Affiliate Bayer AG for Monsanto Company. (Hollingsworth, Joe) (Filed on 5/18/2020) |
Filing 6 Case transferred in from District of Ohio Northern; Case Number 3:20-cv-00717. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
MEMBER CASE OPENED MDL 2741: Northern District of Ohio, 3:20-cv-00717-JZ, Phillips et al v. Monsanto Company, Opened in California Northern District as 20-cv-03065-VC pursuant to Conditional Transfer Order 203 cc: JPMDL (arkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/5/2020) |
Filing 5 Conditional Transfer Order (CTO 203) by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. In Re: MDL 2741 Roundup Products Liability Litigation. Case transferred to the Northern District of California and assigned to the Honorable Vince Chhabria (P,R) |
Filing 4 Return of Service by certified mail executed upon All Defendants on 4/6/2020, filed on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Attachments: #1 Exhibit USPS Signed Returned Green Card)(Ashton, Jonathan) Modified text on 4/16/2020 (R,Ke). |
Filing 3 Civil Case Management Procedures Order. Judge Jack Zouhary on 4/2/2020. (R,Ke) |
Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Monsanto Company. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (R,Ke) |
Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Monsanto Company. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number AOHNDC-9898646. Filed by Mark Phillips, Debra Phillips. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Ashton, Jonathan) |
Judge Jack Zouhary assigned to case. (R,Ke) |
Notice re Prompt Service. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for promptly serving the Complaint on Defendant(s) upon receiving the issued summons from the Clerk and, after service has been perfected, electronically filing a Return of Service or an executed Waiver of Service for each Defendant.Service is to be accomplished pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, which includes provisions for personal service and waiver of service, and Local Rule 4.2. If you wish the Clerk to serve the Complaint on Defendant(s) (a seldom used alternative because it does not save time or money), you must provide the Clerk's office with copies of the Complaint along with other necessary documents, in the manner set forth in Local Rule 4.2(a).After Defendant(s) have been served and counsel enter an appearance, this Court will promptly hold an Initial Phone Status Conference. No Motion to Dismiss may be filed in advance of this Conference. The responsive pleading deadline will be automatically tolled until that time. (R,Ke) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp, II. (R,Ke) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.