Asteelflash Suzhou Co., Ltd. v. Pax Labs, Inc.
| ASTEELFLASH SUZHOU CO., LTD |
| PAX LABS, INC. |
| 3:2020cv03134 |
| May 7, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Vince Chhabria |
| Kandis A Westmore |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 STIPULATION re #2 Complaint filed by Pax Labs, Inc.. (Lateiner, Jeremy) (Filed on 7/1/2020) |
| Filing 12 STIPULATION to extend time to respond to the complaint filed by Pax Labs, Inc.. (Lateiner, Jeremy) (Filed on 6/1/2020) |
| Filing 11 REASSIGNED CASE - NOTICE OF NEW HEARING DATE: You are notified that the Court has scheduled an Initial Case Management Conference before Judge Vince Chhabria upon reassignment. For a copy of Judge Chhabria's Standing Order and other information, please refer to the Court's website at www.cand.uscourts.gov. Case Management Statement due by 7/29/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/5/2020 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 04, 17th Floor. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/25/2020) |
Filing 10
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Vince Chhabria for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by the Clerk on 5/22/2020. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/22/2020)
|
| Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (dtmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/21/2020) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Asteelflash Suzhou Co., Ltd.. (Goldstein, David) (Filed on 5/21/2020) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Asteelflash Suzhou Co., Ltd re #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Complaint Proof of Service Summons and Complaint (Goldstein, David) (Filed on 5/21/2020) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Pax Labs, Inc.. (jjbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/8/2020) |
| Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 8/4/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/11/2020 01:30 PM. (jjbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/8/2020) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 5/21/2020. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/7/2020) |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Entities by ASTEELFLASH SUZHOU CO., LTD identifying Corporate Parent Asteelflash Hong Kong Ltd., Corporate Parent Asteelflash Group S.A., Corporate Parent Financiere AFG S.A.S. for ASTEELFLASH SUZHOU CO., LTD. (Winick, Steven) (Filed on 5/7/2020) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT For Breach of Contract (Receipt #0971-14447391) against PAX LABS, INC.. Filed byASTEELFLASH SUZHOU CO., LTD. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Winick, Steven) (Filed on 5/7/2020) |
| Filing 1 Proposed Summons. (Winick, Steven) (Filed on 5/7/2020) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Asteelflash Suzhou Co., Ltd. v. Pax Labs, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: PAX LABS, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Jeremy Noah Lateiner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: ASTEELFLASH SUZHOU CO., LTD | |
| Represented By: | Steven Howard Winick |
| Represented By: | David Aaron Goldstein |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
