Rydberg v. United States of America Postal Service
Plaintiff: Paula Rydberg
Defendant: United States of America Postal Service and LaMonte Earnest
Case Number: 3:2020cv03230
Filed: May 12, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Sallie Kim
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 10, 2020 Filing 6 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER for Removal and Consolidation filed by LaMonte Earnest. (Lederman, Rachel) (Filed on 7/10/2020)
May 13, 2020 Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Paula Rydberg.. (Hassan, Rey) (Filed on 5/13/2020)
May 12, 2020 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Defendant United States of America Postal Service. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/12/2020)
May 12, 2020 Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Joint Case Management Statement due by 8/3/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/10/2020 at 1:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom C, 15th Floor. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/12/2020)
May 12, 2020 Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 5/26/2020. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/12/2020)
May 12, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for (1) Assault; (2) Civil Stalking (Civ. Code Section 1708.7); (3) Gender Violence (Civ. Code Section 52.4); (4) Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress; (5) Negligence; (6) Negligent Hiring and Supervision; Demand for Jury Trial against United States of America Postal Service, (Filing Fee: $400.00, receipt number 0971-14461130). Filed by PAULA RYDBERG. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hassan, Rey) (Filed on 5/12/2020) Modified on 5/12/2020 (tnS, COURT STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rydberg v. United States of America Postal Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Paula Rydberg
Represented By: Rey Hassan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America Postal Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LaMonte Earnest
Represented By: Rachel Lederman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?