Lee v. The Regents of the University of California
Plaintiff: Matias Lee
Defendant: The Regents of the University of California
Case Number: 3:2020cv03241
Filed: May 12, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Richard Seeborg
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 27, 2020 Filing 12 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal Pursuant To Federal Rule Of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i) by Matias Lee (Bates, Kyle) (Filed on 5/27/2020)
May 19, 2020 Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Todd Michael Schneider , Jason H. Kim, and Kyle G. Bates On Behalf Of Plaintiffs (Schneider, Todd) (Filed on 5/19/2020)
May 18, 2020 Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE RE REASSIGNED CASE: You are notified that the Court has scheduled an in-person Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/13/2020 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom #3, 17th Floor, in San Francisco before Judge Richard Seeborg upon reassignment. Case Management Statement due by 8/6/2020. For a copy of Judge Seeborg's Standing Order and other information, please refer to the Court's website at www.cand.uscourts.gov. If either party so desires, however, counsel may file a request to appear by telephone at 11:00 am, in which case the Conference will be moved to 11:00 am to be held telephonically for all parties, and all parties must contact Court Conference at 866/582-6878 at least one week prior to the Conference. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/18/2020)
May 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER, Case Reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Richard Seeborg for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler no longer assigned to the case.. Signed by The Clerk on 5/18/20. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/18/2020)
May 15, 2020 Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/15/2020)
May 15, 2020 Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Matias Lee.. (Galdston, Benjamin) (Filed on 5/15/2020)
May 13, 2020 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to The Regents of the University of California. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2020)
May 13, 2020 Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 8/6/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/13/2020 11:00 AM. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2020)
May 13, 2020 Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 5/27/2020. (ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2020)
May 12, 2020 Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Entities by Matias Lee (Galdston, Benjamin) (Filed on 5/12/2020)
May 12, 2020 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Galdston, Benjamin) (Filed on 5/12/2020)
May 12, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT - Class Action Complaint against The Regents of the University of California ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-14463453.). Filed byMatias Lee. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Galdston, Benjamin) (Filed on 5/12/2020)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lee v. The Regents of the University of California
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Regents of the University of California
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Matias Lee
Represented By: Benjamin Galdston
Represented By: Kyle Geoffrey Bates
Represented By: Todd Michael Schneider
Represented By: Jason H. Kim
Represented By: Kyle G. Bates
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?