Fortinet, Inc. v. Forescout Technologies, Inc.
| Fortinet, Inc. |
| Forescout Technologies, Inc. |
| 3:2020cv03343 |
| May 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Edward M Chen |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 24
MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.12(b)(6) filed by Forescout Technologies, Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 9/10/2020 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 05, 17th Floor before Judge Edward M. Chen. Responses due by 7/27/2020. Replies due by 8/3/2020. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Anderson, Kimball) (Filed on 7/13/2020)
|
|
Filing 23
Order by Judge Edward M. Chen granting #18 Motion for Pro Hac Vice.(afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/24/2020)
|
|
Filing 22
Order by Judge Edward M. Chen granting #17 Motion for Pro Hac Vice.(afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/24/2020)
|
|
Filing 21
Order by Judge Edward M. Chen granting #16 Motion for Pro Hac Vice.(afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/24/2020)
|
|
Filing 20
Order by Judge Edward M. Chen granting #15 Motion for Pro Hac Vice.(afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/24/2020)
|
|
Filing 19
Order by Judge Edward M. Chen granting #14 Motion for Pro Hac Vice.(afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/24/2020)
|
|
Filing 18
MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice, (Filing Fee: $310.00, receipt number 0971-14613798) filed by Fortinet, Inc.. (Demers, Leslie) (Filed on 6/23/2020)
|
|
Filing 17
MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice, (Filing Fee: $310.00, receipt number 0971-14613773) filed by Fortinet, Inc.. (Blitzer, Rachel) (Filed on 6/23/2020)
|
|
Filing 16
MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice, (Filing Fee: $310.00, receipt number 0971-14613687) filed by Fortinet, Inc.. (Nemec, Douglas) (Filed on 6/23/2020)
|
|
Filing 15
MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice, (Filing Fee: $310.00, receipt number 0971-14612645) filed by Forescout Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #(1) Exhibit Texas Bar Certificate of Good Standing)(Han, Hyun Min) (Filed on 6/23/2020)
|
|
Filing 14
MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice for Kimball R. Anderson, (Filing Fee: $310.00, receipt number 0971-14586305) filed by Forescout Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(Anderson, Kimball) (Filed on 6/16/2020)
|
|
Filing 13
Order by Judge Edward M. Chen granting #12 Stipulation. Answer due 7/13/2020.(afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/10/2020)
|
|
Filing 12
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO re #1 COMPLAINT filed by Forescout Technologies, Inc.. (Vidal, Katherine) (Filed on 6/8/2020) Modified on 6/10/2020 (afmS, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing 11
Corporate Disclosure Statement and Certification of Interested Entities or Persons filed by Forescout Technologies, Inc. identifying Other Affiliate Ferrari Group Holdings, L.P., Other Affiliate Ferrari Merger Sub, Inc. for Forescout Technologies, Inc.. (Vidal, Katherine) (Filed on 6/8/2020)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew R. McCullough (McCullough, Matthew) (Filed on 6/8/2020)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE of Appearance by Katherine Vidal (Vidal, Katherine) (Filed on 6/8/2020)
|
|
Filing 8
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Fortinet, Inc.. Forescout Technologies, Inc. served on 5/21/2020, answer due 6/11/2020. (Neukom, John) (Filed on 6/3/2020)
|
|
Filing 7
Summons Issued as to Defendant Forescout Technologies, Inc.. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/18/2020)
|
|
Filing 6
Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Joint Case Management Statement due by 8/6/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/13/2020 at 9:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 05, 17th Floor. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/18/2020)
|
|
Filing 5
Case assigned to Judge Edward M. Chen. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/15/2020)
|
|
Filing 4
Certificate of Interested Entities or Persons Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 7.1 and Civil L.R. 3-15 filed by Fortinet, Inc.. (Neukom, John) (Filed on 5/15/2020)
|
|
Filing 3
REPORT on the filing of an action regarding U.S. Patent 8,458,314, U.S. Patent 9,369,299, U.S. Patent 9,948,662 (cc: form mailed to register). (Neukom, John) (Filed on 5/15/2020)
|
|
Filing 2
Proposed Summons. (Neukom, John) (Filed on 5/15/2020)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement; Jury Trial Demanded against Forescout Technologies, Inc., (Filing Fee: $400.00, receipt number 0971-14477544). Filed by Fortinet, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Neukom, John) (Filed on 5/15/2020) Modified on 5/18/2020 (tnS, COURT STAFF).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
