Diaz De Leon v. Andrew Saul
| George Diaz De Leon |
| Andrew Saul |
| 3:2020cv03552 |
| May 27, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Sallie Kim |
| Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1383 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Andrew Saul.. (Roth, Armand) (Filed on 7/13/2020) |
| Summons and waiver emailed to SSA. (wsnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/29/2020) |
| Filing 8 Acknowledgment of Receipt by U.S. Marshal re #6 Summons Issued (slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/24/2020) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by George Diaz De Leon.. (Sackett, Harvey) (Filed on 6/12/2020) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Andrew Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 usm form, #2 usm form, #3 usm form)(slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/1/2020) |
| Service packet delivered to the U.S. Marshals Post Box in the Clerks Office mailroom. (slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/1/2020) |
Filing 5
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/29/2020)
|
| Filing 4 SOCIAL SECURITY PROCEDURAL ORDER. (slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/28/2020) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 6/11/2020. (ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/28/2020) |
| Filing 2 First MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis IFP filed by George Diaz De Leon. (Sackett, Harvey) (Filed on 5/27/2020) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT For Judicial Review of Decision of Commissioner of Social Security against Andrew Saul. Filed byGeorge Diaz De Leon. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sackett, Harvey) (Filed on 5/27/2020) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Diaz De Leon v. Andrew Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew Saul | |
| Represented By: | Armand D. Roth |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: George Diaz De Leon | |
| Represented By: | Harvey Peter Sackett |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
