Google LLC v. Sonos, Inc.
Google LLC |
Sonos, Inc. |
3:2020cv03845 |
June 11, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Edward M Chen |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. § 271 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 24 ORDER granting #23 Stipulation filed by Google LLC. Response due 8/12/2020. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/4/2020. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/4/2020) |
Filing 23 STIPULATION FOR SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT filed by Google LLC. (Curran, Patrick) (Filed on 8/4/2020) |
Filing 22 ORDER granting #21 Stipulation filed by Google LLC. Answer due 8/5/2020. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/7/2020. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/7/2020) |
Filing 21 STIPULATION re #1 Complaint,, For Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond filed by Google LLC. (Curran, Patrick) (Filed on 7/3/2020) |
Filing 20 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ORDER IN REASSIGNED CASE: Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/8/2020 09:30 AM in San Francisco. Joint Case Management Statement due by 10/1/2020. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/30/2020. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2020) |
Filing 19 Order by Judge Edward M. Chen granting #13 Motion for Pro Hac Vice.(afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2020) |
Filing 18 Order by Judge Edward M. Chen granting #9 Motion for Pro Hac Vice.(afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2020) |
Filing 17 ORDER, Case Reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Edward M. Chen for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler no longer assigned to the case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by The Clerk on 6/29/20. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/29/2020) |
Filing 16 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/29/2020) |
Filing 15 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Google LLC pursuant to Local Rules (Curran, Patrick) (Filed on 6/26/2020) |
Filing 14 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Google LLC.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Curran, Patrick) (Filed on 6/26/2020) |
Filing 13 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Google LLC ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-14628051.) filed by Google LLC. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Nelson, David) (Filed on 6/26/2020) |
Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Google LLC. Sonos, Inc. served on 6/15/2020, answer due 7/6/2020. (Curran, Patrick) (Filed on 6/15/2020) |
Filing 11 Summons Issued as to Sonos, Inc. (arkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/12/2020) |
Filing 10 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 9/3/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/10/2020 11:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom B, 15th Floor. (arkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/12/2020) |
Filing 9 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Google LLC ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-14571432.) filed by Google LLC. (Attachments: #1 Certification of Good Standing for Jeffrey S. Gerchick)(Gerchick, Jeffrey) (Filed on 6/12/2020) |
Filing 8 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding Patents (U.S. Patent No. 7,899,187; U.S. Patent No. 8,583,489; U.S. Patent No. 10,140,375; U.S. Patent No. 7,065,206; and U.S. Patent No. 10,229,586) (cc: form mailed to register). (Curran, Patrick) (Filed on 6/12/2020) |
Filing 7 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 6/26/2020. (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/12/2020) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Patrick Thomas Schmidt on behalf of Plaintiff Google LLC (Schmidt, Patrick) (Filed on 6/12/2020) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Patrick Daniel Curran on behalf of Plaintiff Google LLC (Curran, Patrick) (Filed on 6/12/2020) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Charles Kramer Verhoeven on behalf of Plaintiff Google LLC (Verhoeven, Charles) (Filed on 6/12/2020) |
Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Entities by Google LLC identifying Corporate Parent Alphabet Inc., Corporate Parent XXVI Holdings Inc. for Google LLC. (Verhoeven, Charles) (Filed on 6/11/2020) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Verhoeven, Charles) (Filed on 6/11/2020) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT For Patent Infringement against All Defendants. Filed byGoogle LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17, #18 Exhibit 18, #19 Exhibit 19, #20 Exhibit 20, #21 Exhibit 21, #22 Exhibit 22, #23 Exhibit 23, #24 Exhibit 24, #25 Exhibit 25, #26 Exhibit 26, #27 Civil Cover Sheet)(Verhoeven, Charles) (Filed on 6/11/2020) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Google LLC v. Sonos, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Sonos, Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Google LLC | |
Represented By: | Charles Kramer Verhoeven |
Represented By: | Patrick Daniel Curran |
Represented By: | Patrick Thomas Schmidt |
Represented By: | Jeffrey S. Gerchick |
Represented By: | David A. Nelson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.