Rosales v. Benihana National Corp. et al
Salvador Rosales |
Benihana National Corp. and Benihana, Inc. |
3:2020cv03903 |
June 12, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Laurel Beeler |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE: Initial Case Management Conference previously set for 9/10/2020 is reset to 10/15/2020 at 9:30 AM. Case Management Statement due by 10/8/2020. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/16/2020) |
Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Benihana National Corp., Benihana, Inc... (Greeson, Chad) (Filed on 7/1/2020) |
Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Salvador Rosales.. (Uriarte, Arlo) (Filed on 6/22/2020) |
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Benihana National Corp., Benihana, Inc. (Greeson, Chad) (Filed on 6/16/2020) |
Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Joint Case Management Statement due by 9 /3/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/10/2020 at 11:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom B, 15th Floor. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/15/2020) |
Answer to Removal Complaint (Plaintiff's Unverified Complaint) [Refer to Docket #1 - page 74] by Benihana National Corp., Benihana, Inc.. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/12/2020) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Benihana National Corp., Benihana, Inc. (Greeson, Chad) (Filed on 6/12/2020) |
Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Entities or Persons filed by Benihana National Corp., Benihana, Inc. identifying Other Affiliate Benihana National Corp., Benihana, Inc. for Safflower Holdings, LLC (Greeson, Chad) (Filed on 6/12/2020) |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 6/26/2020. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/12/2020) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1332(d)(2) (CAFA) from San Francisco County Superior Court. Their case number is CGC-20-582696, (Filing Fee: $400.00 receipt number 0971-14573421). Filed by Benihana, Inc., Benihana National Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Nicole Thaung, #2 Declaration Sharon Rose, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Greeson, Chad) (Filed on 6/12/2020) Modified on 6/15/2020 (tnS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.