Highbaugh v. City of Vallejo et al
| Everette Highbaugh |
| City of Vallejo and City Of Oakland |
| 3:2020cv03911 |
| June 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| William Alsup |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by City of Oakland. Service waived by City of Oakland waiver sent on 6/27/2020, answer due 8/26/2020. (Patterson, Benjamin) (Filed on 7/29/2020)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE of Appearance by Pamela Kentos Graham as Counsel for City of Vallejo and Vallejo Doe Police Officers 1-25 (Graham, Pamela) (Filed on 7/28/2020)
|
|
Filing 9
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by City of Vallejo. Service waived by City of Vallejo waiver sent on 6/27/2020, answer due 8/26/2020. (Damle, Nikhil) (Filed on 7/23/2020)
|
|
Electronic receipt of acknowledgment of service packet by the City of Oakland. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2020)
|
|
Filing 8
Summons Issued as to City of Oakland, City of Vallejo. (Attachments: #1 USM-City of Vallejo, #2 USM-City of Oakland)(mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/13/2020)
|
|
Service packet delivered to the U.S. Marshal Post Box in the Clerk's office mailroom. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/13/2020)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER GRANTING #2 APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. The clerk shall please issue summons. By Judge Alsup. (whalc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/10/2020)
|
|
#Electronic filing error. This filing will not be processed by the clerks office pending ruling on the Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Re: #6 Proposed Summons filed by Everette Highbaugh. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/29/2020)
|
|
Filing 6
*** ERRONEOUS ENTRY *** Proposed Summons. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Goff, Stanley) (Filed on 6/27/2020) Modified on 6/29/2020 (mclS, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing 5
Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Case Management Statement due by 9/17/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/24/2020 11:00 AM. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/15/2020)
|
|
Filing 4
Case assigned to Judge William Alsup. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (anjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/15/2020)
|
|
Filing 3
CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Everette Highbaugh.. (Goff, Stanley) (Filed on 6/14/2020)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Everette Highbaugh. (Goff, Stanley) (Filed on 6/14/2020)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filed byEverette Highbaugh. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Goff, Stanley) (Filed on 6/14/2020)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
