Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
| Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe |
| John Does 1-100, Inclusive, Altria Group, Inc., Altria Client Services LLC, Altria Group Distribution Company, Juul Labs, Inc., Nu Mark LLC and Philip Morris USA, Inc. |
| 3:2020cv03985 |
| June 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| William H Orrick |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe. Philip Morris USA, Inc. served on 7/8/2020, answer due 7/29/2020. (Strommer, Geoffrey) (Filed on 8/3/2020) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe. Nu Mark LLC served on 7/8/2020, answer due 7/29/2020. (Strommer, Geoffrey) (Filed on 8/3/2020) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe. Juul Labs, Inc. served on 7/8/2020, answer due 7/29/2020. (Strommer, Geoffrey) (Filed on 8/3/2020) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe. Altria Group, Inc. served on 7/8/2020, answer due 7/29/2020. (Strommer, Geoffrey) (Filed on 8/3/2020) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe. Altria Group Distribution Company served on 7/8/2020, answer due 7/29/2020. (Strommer, Geoffrey) (Filed on 8/3/2020) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe. Altria Client Services LLC served on 7/8/2020, answer due 7/29/2020. (Strommer, Geoffrey) (Filed on 8/3/2020) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Altria Client Services LLC, Altria Group Distribution Company, Altria Group, Inc., Juul Labs, Inc., Nu Mark LLC, Philip Morris USA, Inc. (arkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2020) |
| Filing 5 Proposed Summons. (Strommer, Geoffrey) (Filed on 6/17/2020) |
| Filing 4 Proposed Summons. (Strommer, Geoffrey) (Filed on 6/17/2020) |
| #Electronic filing error. This filing will not be processed by the clerks office.Please re-file in its entirety without doe defendants listed. Re: #2 Proposed Summons filed by S aint Regis Mohawk Tribe (arkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2020) |
| #Electronic filing error. Summons lists incorrect plaintiff. This filing will not be processed by the clerks office. Please re-file in its entirety. Re: #4 Proposed Summons filed by Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe (arkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2020) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge William H. Orrick. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/16/2020) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Strommer, Geoffrey) (Filed on 6/15/2020) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-14582750.). Filed bySaint Regis Mohawk Tribe. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Strommer, Geoffrey) (Filed on 6/15/2020) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
