Barton v. Saul
| Stephen Barton |
| Andrew Saul |
| 3:2020cv04070 |
| June 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Vince Chhabria |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Acknowledgment of Receipt re #6 Summons Issued. (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/14/2020) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Andrew Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/13/2020) |
| Summons and waiver emailed to Social Security Administration. (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/13/2020) |
Filing 5
Order by Judge Vince Chhabria granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The complaint having been found to comply with Title 28 USC 1915, IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk issue summons, and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the U.S. Marshal for the Northern District of California serve, without prepayment of fees, a copy of the complaint, any amendments, attachments, scheduling orders and other documents specified by the Clerk, plaintiff's affidavit and this order upon the defendant.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2020)
|
| Filing 4 SOCIAL SECURITY PROCEDURAL ORDER. (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/22/2020) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge Vince Chhabria. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/19/2020) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Stephen Barton. (Jiang, Xinyun) (Filed on 6/18/2020) Modified on 6/22/2020 (gbaS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Judicial Review of Decision of Commissioner of Social Security against Andrew Saul (Filing Fee IFPP). Filed by Stephen Barton. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Jiang, Xinyun) (Filed on 6/18/2020) Modified on 6/22/2020 (gbaS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Barton v. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew Saul | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Stephen Barton | |
| Represented By: | Xinyun Jiang |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
