Reffind Limited v. Loyyal Corporation
Plaintiff: REFFIND LIMITED
Defendant: LOYYAL CORPORATION
Case Number: 4:2020cv04180
Filed: June 24, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Donna M Ryu
Nature of Suit: Negotiable Instrument
Cause of Action: 12 U.S.C. ยง 1819
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 5, 2020 Filing 17 REMARK: The court has received the Stipulation of Dismissal #16 . Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A), no court order is required to dismiss this action. The parties are hereby notified that this matter is terminated. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/5/2020)
August 4, 2020 Filing 16 STIPULATION of Dismissal filed by Reffind Limited, Loyyal Corporation. (Mendelman, Jeffrey) (Filed on 8/4/2020) Modified on 8/5/2020 (cjlS, COURT STAFF).
August 3, 2020 Filing 15 NOTICE OF BANKRUPTCY CASE FILING AND AUTOMATIC STAY by Loyyal Corporation. (Roberts, Todd) (Filed on 8/3/2020) Modified on 8/4/2020 (cjlS, COURT STAFF).
August 3, 2020 Filing 14 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Loyyal Corporation.. (Roberts, Todd) (Filed on 8/3/2020)
July 28, 2020 Filing 13 NOTICE OF RELATED BANKRUPTCY CASE FILED by Reffind Limited. (Mendelman, Jeffrey) (Filed on 7/28/2020) Modified on 7/29/2020 (cjlS, COURT STAFF).
July 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu granting #6 Motion to Remove Incorrectly Filed Document. Signed on 7/28/2020.(dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/28/2020)
July 20, 2020 Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE TO DEFENDANT Re: Consent or Declination: Defendant shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 8/3/2020. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/20/2020)
July 17, 2020 Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand byLoyyal Corporation. (Roberts, Todd) (Filed on 7/17/2020)
June 30, 2020 Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Reffind Limited re 4 Case Assigned by Intake,,, #5 Complaint, #8 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines, #2 Proposed Summons, #7 Summons Issued, #6 MOTION to Remove Incorrectly Filed Document #1 , #1 Complaint, #3 Consent/Declination to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge (Mendelman, Jeffrey) (Filed on 6/30/2020)
June 25, 2020 Filing 8 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 9/23/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/30/2020 01:30 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor. (cjlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/25/2020)
June 25, 2020 Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Loyyal Corporation. (cjlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/25/2020)
June 25, 2020 Filing 6 MOTION to Remove Incorrectly Filed Document #1 filed by Reffind Limited. (Mendelman, Jeffrey) (Filed on 6/25/2020) Modified on 6/26/2020 (cjlS, COURT STAFF).
June 25, 2020 Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Loyyal Corporation. Filed by Reffind Limited. (Mendelman, Jeffrey. (Filed on 6/25/2020) Modified on 6/26/2020 (cjlS, COURT STAFF).
June 25, 2020 Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 7/9/2020. (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/25/2020)
June 24, 2020 Filing 3 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by REFFIND LIMITED.. (Mendelman, Jeffrey) (Filed on 6/24/2020)
June 24, 2020 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Mendelman, Jeffrey) (Filed on 6/24/2020)
June 24, 2020 Filing 1 ***SEE CORRECTED COMPLAINT FILED AT DOCKET ENTRY #5 *** COMPLAINT against Loyyal Corporation (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0971-14619488). Filed by Reffind Limited. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Mendelman, Jeffrey) (Filed on 6/24/2020) Modified on 6/25/2020 (cjlS, COURT STAFF). Modified on 6/25/2020 (cjlS, COURT STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Reffind Limited v. Loyyal Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: REFFIND LIMITED
Represented By: Jeffrey Louis Mendelman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LOYYAL CORPORATION
Represented By: Todd Andrew Roberts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?