RAMAH NAVAJO SCHOOL BOARD, INC. v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
RAMAH NAVAJO SCHOOL BOARD, INC. |
Altria Group, Inc., Altria Client Services LLC, Altria Group Distribution Company, Juul Labs, Inc., Nu Mark LLC and Philip Morris USA, Inc. |
3:2020cv04406 |
July 1, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
William H Orrick |
Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 Order by Judge William H. Orrick granting #11 Motion for Pro Hac Vice by F. Michael Willis. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/17/2020) |
Filing 11 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice for F. Michael Willis ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-14818571.) filed by RAMAH NAVAJO SCHOOL BOARD, INC.. (Strommer, Geoffrey) (Filed on 8/14/2020) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by RAMAH NAVAJO SCHOOL BOARD, INC.. Philip Morris USA, Inc. served on 7/8/2020, answer due 7/29/2020. (Strommer, Geoffrey) (Filed on 8/4/2020) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by RAMAH NAVAJO SCHOOL BOARD, INC.. Nu Mark LLC served on 7/8/2020, answer due 7/29/2020. (Strommer, Geoffrey) (Filed on 8/4/2020) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by RAMAH NAVAJO SCHOOL BOARD, INC.. Juul Labs, Inc. served on 7/8/2020, answer due 7/29/2020. (Strommer, Geoffrey) (Filed on 8/4/2020) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by RAMAH NAVAJO SCHOOL BOARD, INC.. Altria Group, Inc. served on 7/8/2020, answer due 7/29/2020. (Strommer, Geoffrey) (Filed on 8/4/2020) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by RAMAH NAVAJO SCHOOL BOARD, INC.. Altria Group Distribution Company served on 7/8/2020, answer due 7/29/2020. (Strommer, Geoffrey) (Filed on 8/4/2020) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by RAMAH NAVAJO SCHOOL BOARD, INC.. Altria Client Services LLC served on 7/8/2020, answer due 7/29/2020. (Strommer, Geoffrey) (Filed on 8/4/2020) |
Filing 4 Case assigned to Judge William H. Orrick. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2020) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Altria Client Services LLC, Altria Group Distribution Company, Altria Group, Inc., Juul Labs, Inc., Nu Mark LLC, Philip Morris USA, Inc.. (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2020) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Strommer, Geoffrey) (Filed on 7/1/2020) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-14644307.). Filed byRAMAH NAVAJO SCHOOL BOARD, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Strommer, Geoffrey) (Filed on 7/1/2020) |
MEMBER CASE OPENED: RAMAH NAVAJO SCHOOL BOARD, INC. v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al, Opened in California Northern District as 3:20-cv-04406 cc: JPMDL (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2020) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.