Everett-Lee v. Saul
Plaintiff: Freddie Mae Everett-Lee
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security and Andrew Saul
Case Number: 3:2020cv04433
Filed: July 2, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Laurel Beeler
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 9, 2020 Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Freddie Mae Everett-Lee.. (Rohlfing, Lawrence) (Filed on 7/9/2020)
July 7, 2020 Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Andrew Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (elyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/7/2020)
July 7, 2020 Summons and waiver emailed to SSA. (elyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/7/2020)
July 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SCHEDULING ORDER (Social Security Review Action)(tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/6/2020)
July 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Order by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis.(ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/6/2020)
July 2, 2020 Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 7/16/2020. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2020)
July 2, 2020 Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Rohlfing, Lawrence) (Filed on 7/2/2020)
July 2, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Freddie Mae Everett-Lee. (Rohlfing, Lawrence) (Filed on 7/2/2020)
July 2, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT For Review Of Final Decision Of The Commissioner Of Social Security against Commissioner of Social Security. Filed by Freddie Mae Everett-Lee. (Attachments: (1) Civil Cover Sheet)(Rohlfing, Lawrence) (Filed on 7/2/2020) Modified on 7/6/2020 (tnS, COURT STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Everett-Lee v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Freddie Mae Everett-Lee
Represented By: Lawrence David Rohlfing
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?