Hensley v. Sattui et al
Plaintiff: Barry Hensley
Defendant: Villa Amorosa, Inc., Dario Sattui, Castello di Amorosa and Irina Yartsev
Case Number: 3:2020cv04580
Filed: July 9, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Sallie Kim
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 31, 2020 Filing 22 Minute Entry for proceedings held by Zoom before Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim: Motion Hearing held on 8/31/2020 re #11 MOTION to Remand to State Court; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support filed by Barry Hensley. The Court ordered a two-hour deposition of plaintiff for purposes of jurisdictional discovery. Deposition may take place over videoconference. Parties will meet and confer to schedule the deposition. Defendant to submit a brief of no more than 5 pages, within 10 business days of deposition. Plaintiff may submit a brief of no more than 5 pages, after 5 business days. Court will decide the matter on the papers. (Total Time in Court: 5 minutes.) (Court Reporter: Belle Ball.) Attorney for Plaintiff: Nicole Jaffee. Attorney for Defendants: Amy Frenzen. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 8/31/2020)
August 17, 2020 Filing 21 REPLY (re #11 MOTION to Remand to State Court; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support ) filed byBarry Hensley. (Miller, Michael) (Filed on 8/17/2020)
August 10, 2020 Filing 20 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #11 MOTION to Remand to State Court; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support ) filed byCastello di Amorosa, Dario Sattui, Irina Yartsev. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Irina Yartseva Sattui, #2 Exhibit Exhibits A-J to Declaration)(Frenzen, Amy) (Filed on 8/10/2020)
July 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim granting #15 Administrative Motion to continue hearing on motion to dismiss. Responses due by 9/14/2020. Replies due by 9/21/2020. Motion Hearing set for 9/28/2020 09:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom C, 15th Floor before Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. (sklc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2020)
July 29, 2020 Filing 18 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #15 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION Administrative Relief to Reseet Hearing on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Briefing Schedule ) filed byCastello di Amorosa, Dario Sattui, Irina Yartsev. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Amy P. Frenzen)(Frenzen, Amy) (Filed on 7/29/2020)
July 27, 2020 Filing 17 Proposed Order Granting Plaintiff Barry Hensley's Motion for Administrative Relief to Reset Hearing on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Briefing Schedule by Barry Hensley. (Miller, Michael) (Filed on 7/27/2020)
July 27, 2020 Filing 16 Declaration of Michael G. Miller in Support of Plaintiff Barry Hensley's Motion for Administrative Relief to Reset Hearing on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Briefing Schedule filed byBarry Hensley. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Miller, Michael) (Filed on 7/27/2020)
July 27, 2020 Filing 15 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION Administrative Relief to Reseet Hearing on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Briefing Schedule filed by Barry Hensley. Responses due by 9/14/2020. (Miller, Michael) (Filed on 7/27/2020)
July 27, 2020 Filing 14 Proposed Order Granting Plaintiff Barry Hensley's Motion to Remand to State Court by Barry Hensley. (Miller, Michael) (Filed on 7/27/2020)
July 27, 2020 Filing 13 Declaration of Michael G. Miller in Support of Plaintiff Barry Hensley's Motion to Remand to State Court filed byBarry Hensley. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Miller, Michael) (Filed on 7/27/2020)
July 27, 2020 Filing 12 Declaration of Barry Hensley in Support of Motion to Remand filed byBarry Hensley. (Miller, Michael) (Filed on 7/27/2020)
July 27, 2020 Filing 11 MOTION to Remand to State Court; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support filed by Barry Hensley. Motion Hearing set for 8/31/2020 09:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom C, 15th Floor before Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Responses due by 8/10/2020. Replies due by 8/17/2020. (Miller, Michael) (Filed on 7/27/2020)
July 24, 2020 Filing 10 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Barry Hensley.. (Miller, Michael) (Filed on 7/24/2020)
July 24, 2020 Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Castello di Amorosa, Dario Sattui, Irina Yartsev.. (Frenzen, Amy) (Filed on 7/24/2020)
July 20, 2020 Filing 8 Rule 7.1 Disclosures by Castello di Amorosa (Sween, Lisa) (Filed on 7/20/2020)
July 20, 2020 Filing 7 Certificate of Interested Entities by Castello di Amorosa (Sween, Lisa) (Filed on 7/20/2020)
July 17, 2020 Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff/Defendants shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 7/24/2020. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/17/2020)
July 16, 2020 Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Castello di Amorosa, Dario Sattui, Villa Amorosa, Inc., Irina Yartsev. Motion Hearing set for 8/24/2020 09:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom C, 15th Floor before Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Responses due by 7/30/2020. Replies due by 8/6/2020. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Amy P. Frenzen, #2 Proposed Order)(Frenzen, Amy) (Filed on 7/16/2020)
July 13, 2020 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Castello di Amorosa, Dario Sattui, Villa Amorosa, Inc., Irina Yartsev re #1 Notice of Removal, re 2 Case Assigned by Intake, re #3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines (Frenzen, Amy) (Filed on 7/13/2020)
July 10, 2020 Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 10/12/20 20. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/19/2020 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom C, 15th Floor. (hdjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/10/2020)
July 10, 2020 Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 7/24/2020. (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/10/2020)
July 9, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Napa County Superior Court. Their case number is C20CV000423. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0971-14674012). Filed byVilla Amorosa, Inc., Irina Yartsev, Dario Sattui, Castello di Amorosa. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Dario Sattui, #2 Declaration of Irina Yartseva Sattui, #3 Declaration of Amy P. Frenzen, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Frenzen, Amy) (Filed on 7/9/2020)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hensley v. Sattui et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Barry Hensley
Represented By: Nicole M. Jaffee
Represented By: Michael Gregory Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Villa Amorosa, Inc.
Represented By: Amy Pizzo Frenzen
Represented By: Lisa Barnett Sween
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dario Sattui
Represented By: Amy Pizzo Frenzen
Represented By: Lisa Barnett Sween
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Castello di Amorosa
Represented By: Amy Pizzo Frenzen
Represented By: Lisa Barnett Sween
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Irina Yartsev
Represented By: Amy Pizzo Frenzen
Represented By: Lisa Barnett Sween
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?