Mendoza v. Frauenheim
Petitioner: Marcos Mendoza
Respondent: Warden Scott Frauenheim and Secretary Ralph M. Diaz
Case Number: 3:2020cv04631
Filed: July 11, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Edward M Chen
Referring Judge: Sallie Kim
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER, Case Reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Edward M. Chen for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim no longer assigned to the case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by The Clerk on 9/8/20. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/8/2020)
September 4, 2020 Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/4/2020)
September 4, 2020 Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Scott Frauenheim.. (Swanson, Michele) (Filed on 9/4/2020)
August 18, 2020 CA State Attorney General acknowledged receipt of documents served by email. (mclS, COURT STAFF)
August 18, 2020 copy of #1 Petition, #5 Order to show cause, Notice of Assignment of prisoner case to a United States magistrate judge and a blank magistrate judge jurisdiction consent or declination to consent form sent by email to CA Attorney General. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/18/2020)
August 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Habeas Answer or Dispositive Motion due by 10/16/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim on 8/17/2020. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/17/2020)
August 7, 2020 Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Marcos Mendoza.. (Thomson, James) (Filed on 8/7/2020)
July 31, 2020 Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Petitioner shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 8/14/2020. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2020)
July 14, 2020 #Electronic filing error. E-filer is reminded NOT to enter party not named in the petition. Corrected by Clerk's Office. Re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Ma rcos Mendoza. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/14/2020)
July 13, 2020 Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 7/27/2020. (anjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/13/2020)
July 11, 2020 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5.00 receipt number 0971-14681046.). Filed byMarcos Mendoza. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Thomson, James) (Filed on 7/11/2020)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mendoza v. Frauenheim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Scott Frauenheim
Represented By: Michele Joette Swanson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Secretary Ralph M. Diaz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Marcos Mendoza
Represented By: James Scott Thomson
Represented By: Ethan H. Stone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?