Williams v. Praetorian Insurance Company
| Kevin B. Williams |
| Praetorian Insurance Company doing business as QBE, LLP |
| 3:2020cv04766 |
| July 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Thomas S Hixson |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER by Judge Thomas S. Hixson granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and screening complaint. Amended Pleadings due by 8/17/2020. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/16/2020)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER by Judge Thomas S. Hixson finding as moot #5 Motion for Permission for Electronic Case Filing. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/16/2020)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE REGARDING RESOURCES AVAILABLE TO PRO SE LITIGANTS AND ORDER. Signed by Judge Hixson on 7/16/20. (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/10/2020)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Permission for Electronic Case Filing filed by Kevin B. Williams. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/10/2020) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Kevin B. Williams. (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/10/2020) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/10/2020) |
| Filing 2 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 10/1/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/8/2020 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom G, 15th Floor. (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/10/2020)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/16/2020: #1 Standing Order) (fabS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Praetorian Insurance Company. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL. Filed byKevin B. Williams. Consent/Declination due by 7/24/2020. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/10/2020) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/16/2020: #2 Envelope) (fabS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Williams v. Praetorian Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Praetorian Insurance Company doing business as QBE, LLP | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kevin B. Williams | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
