Oregon Sealark L.L.C. et al
| Oregon Sealark L.L.C. and Brusco Tug & Barge, Inc. |
| 3:2020cv04815 |
| July 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Maxine M Chesney |
| Marine |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE - OCTOBER 23, 2020 INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE WILL BE HELD TELEPHONICALLY. The Court will initiate the call. Counsel participating in the conference call are directed to email their name and direct phone number to: mmccrd@cand.uscourts.gov. Due to multiple hearings, counsel are advised to be on telephone stand-by from 10:30 AM until called by the Court. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/11/2020) |
Filing 9
CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/23/2020 at 10:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 07, 19th Floor. Joint Case Management Statement due by 10/16/2020.. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 7/22/2020. (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2020)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER, Case Reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Maxine M. Chesney for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley no longer assigned to the case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by The Clerk on 7/22/20. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2020)
|
| Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/21/2020) |
| Filing 6 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 10/15/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/22/2020 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom E, 15th Floor. (arkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/21/2020) |
| Filing 5 STIPULATION Ad Interim for Value and Costs & Letter of Undertaking filed by Brusco Tug & Barge, Inc., Oregon Sealark L.L.C.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Ad Interim Stipulation)(Schultz, Pamela) (Filed on 7/20/2020) |
| Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Brusco Tug & Barge, Inc., Oregon Sealark L.L.C... (Schultz, Pamela) (Filed on 7/20/2020) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 8/3/2020. (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/20/2020) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Brusco Tug & Barge, Inc., Oregon Sealark L.L.C. identifying Corporate Parent Brusco Maritime Company for Brusco Tug & Barge, Inc.. (Schultz, Pamela) (Filed on 7/17/2020) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability against Brusco Tug & Barge, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-14707255.). Filed byOregon Sealark L.L.C., Brusco Tug & Barge, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 to Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Schultz, Pamela) (Filed on 7/17/2020) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Oregon Sealark L.L.C. et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Oregon Sealark L.L.C. | |
| Represented By: | Pamela L. Schultz |
| Represented By: | Bradley Harris Pace |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Brusco Tug & Barge, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Pamela L. Schultz |
| Represented By: | Bradley Harris Pace |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
