Cobb et al v. Monsanto Company
| Jason Cobb and Gretchen Cobb |
| Monsanto Company |
| 3:2020cv04833 |
| July 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Vince Chhabria |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand filed by Monsanto Company. (Hollingsworth, Joe) (Filed on 8/17/2020) |
| Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Monsanto Company identifying Other Affiliate Bayer AG for Monsanto Company. (Hollingsworth, Joe) (Filed on 8/17/2020) |
| Filing 10 Certificate of Interested Entities by Monsanto Company identifying Other Affiliate Bayer AG for Monsanto Company. (Hollingsworth, Joe) (Filed on 8/17/2020) |
| Filing 9 Case Transferred in from United States District Court for the District of Arizona (Phoenix Division); Case Number 2:20-cv-01262-JJT. Original File Certified Copy of Transfer Order and Docket Sheet Received. |
| MEMBER CASE OPENED: USDC, District of Arizona (Phoenix Division), 2:20-cv-01262-JJT, Jason Cobb, et al v. Monsanto Company, Opened in California Northern District as 3:20-cv-04833-VC pursuant to Conditional Transfer Order (CTO-222) cc: JPMDL (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/20/2020) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFIED MDL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-222) Transferring Case to the Northern District of California Re MDL-2741. (MAP) |
| Remark: Case Transferred to the Northern District of California via electronic transfer. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
| Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Joshua A Karr on behalf of Plaintiffs Gretchen Cobb, Jason Cobb. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Filing 7
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED directing the Clerk of Court to terminate any or all Defendants in this matter, without further notice, that have not been served within the time required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) on September 24, 2020. (See attached Order). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 6/26/2020. (JAMA)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that motions to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 (b) and motions to strike pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f) are discouraged if the defect that would be the subject of the motion can be cured by filing an amended pleading. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this Order on Defendants. (See attached Order). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 6/26/2020. (JAMA)
|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Monsanto Company. (REK). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 4 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-18419538. This case has been assigned to the Honorable John J. Tuchi. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-20-01262-PHX-JJT. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (REK) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Submitted by Gretchen Cobb, Jason Cobb. (submitted by Jonathan O'Steen) (REK) |
| Filing 2 PLAINTIFF'S DEMAND for Jury Trial by Gretchen Cobb, Jason Cobb. (submitted by Jonathan O'Steen) (REK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $400.00, receipt number 0970-18419538 filed by Jason Cobb, Gretchen Cobb. (submitted by Jonathan O'Steen) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (REK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
