Seabury v. San Ramon Valley Unified School District
| Thomas Seabury |
| San Ramon Valley Unified School District |
| 3:2020cv04928 |
| July 22, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Edward M Chen |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ORDER IN REASSIGNED CASE: Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/19/2020 09:30 AM in San Francisco. Joint Case Management Statement due by 11/12/2020. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/13/2020. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2020)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Edward M. Chen for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by Clerk on 08/07/2020. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/7/2020)
|
| Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2020) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by San Ramon Valley Unified School District re #5 Consent/Declination to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge (Ly, Huan Dinh) (Filed on 8/6/2020) |
| Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by San Ramon Valley Unified School District.. (Ly, Huan Dinh) (Filed on 8/6/2020) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by San Ramon Valley Unified School District (1) Notice of Removal; (2) Civil Case Coversheet; (3) United States District Court, Northern District ECF Registration; (4) Notice of Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of Summons; (5) Notice of Assignment of Case to Unites States Magistrate Judge for Trial; (6) Waiver of the Service of Summons; (7) Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines; and (8) Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixon's Standing Order (Ly, Huan Dinh) (Filed on 7/27/2020) |
| Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 10/15/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/22/2020 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom G, 15th Floor. (hdjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/24/2020)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 8/6/2020. (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/23/2020) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Contra Costa Superior Court. Their case number is CIVMSC20-00217. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0971-14723291). Filed bySan Ramon Valley Unified School District. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A to Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B to Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Ly, Huan Dinh) (Filed on 7/22/2020) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Seabury v. San Ramon Valley Unified School District | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Thomas Seabury | |
| Represented By: | Michael Shane Biggs |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: San Ramon Valley Unified School District | |
| Represented By: | Huan Dinh Ly |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
