Massie v. Eli Lilly and Company
| Robert Massie |
| Eli Lilly and Company |
| 3:2020cv05111 |
| July 27, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Richard Seeborg |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 8/7/2020. (clS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/7/2020)
|
| Filing 7 Response to Order to Show Cause #6 Order to Show Cause byRobert Massie. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(LoPalo, Christopher) (Filed on 8/7/2020) Modified on 8/7/2020 (mclS, COURT STAFF). |
|
Filing 6
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 7/30/2020. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2020)
|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Eli Lilly and Company. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/28/2020) |
| DIRECT MEMBER CASE OPENED: MDL 2691, Massie v. Eli Lilly and Company, Opened in California Northern District as 20-cv-05111 RS pursuant to Conditional Transfer Order cc: JPMDL (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/27/2020) |
| Cases associated: Create association to 3:16-md-02691-RS. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/27/2020) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Judge Richard Seeborg. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (anjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/27/2020) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher R. LoPalo (LoPalo, Christopher) (Filed on 7/27/2020) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (LoPalo, Christopher) (Filed on 7/27/2020) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Eli Lilly and Company ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-14737352.). Filed byRobert Massie. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(LoPalo, Christopher) (Filed on 7/27/2020) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Massie v. Eli Lilly and Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Eli Lilly and Company | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Robert Massie | |
| Represented By: | Christopher R. LoPalo |
| Represented By: | Wendy Aline Mitchell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
