Bielfield v. Saul
Plaintiff: Christine Elizabeth Bielfield
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security and Andrew Saul
Case Number: 3:2020cv05202
Filed: July 29, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Susan Illston
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 4, 2020 SSA acknowledged receipt of documents and waiver on 8/4/2020. (mclS, COURT STAFF)
August 4, 2020 Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Andrew Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2020)
August 4, 2020 Summons and waiver emailed to SSA. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/4/2020)
August 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Order by Judge Susan Illston granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (tvnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/3/2020)
July 31, 2020 Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Christine Elizabeth Bielfield.. (Cho, Young) (Filed on 7/31/2020)
July 30, 2020 Filing 5 SOCIAL SECURITY PROCEDURAL ORDER. (slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2020)
July 29, 2020 Filing 4 Case assigned to Judge Susan Illston. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (anjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2020)
July 29, 2020 Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Cho, Young) (Filed on 7/29/2020)
July 29, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Christine Elizabeth Bielfield. (Cho, Young) (Filed on 7/29/2020)
July 29, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT For Review Of Final Decision Of The Commissioner Of Social Security against Andrew Saul. Filed by Christine Elizabeth Bielfield. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Cho, Young) (Filed on 7/29/2020) Modified on 7/30/2020 (slhS, COURT STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bielfield v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christine Elizabeth Bielfield
Represented By: Young Chul Cho
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?