Gilliam v. Navios Maritime Containers, L.P.
| Colvin Gilliam |
| Navios Maritime Containers, L.P. |
| 3:2020cv05456 |
| August 6, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Joseph C Spero |
| Marine |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Navios Maritime Containers, L.P... (Giffin, John) (Filed on 8/13/2020) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) byNavios Maritime Containers, L.P.. (Giffin, John) (Filed on 8/13/2020) |
| Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Colvin Gilliam.. (Jacobson, Derek) (Filed on 8/11/2020) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Navios Maritime Containers, L.P. re 2 Case Assigned by Intake,,, #3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines, (Giffin, John) (Filed on 8/7/2020) |
| Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 10/30/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/6/2020 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom F, 15th Floor. (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/7/2020) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 8/20/2020. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2020) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Alameda County Superior Court. Their case number is RG20065680. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0971-14783528). Filed byNavios Maritime Containers, L.P.. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Filing of Removal of Action, #2 Declaration Declaration of George Croton, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Croton, George) (Filed on 8/6/2020) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Gilliam v. Navios Maritime Containers, L.P. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Colvin Gilliam | |
| Represented By: | Derek B. Jacobson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Navios Maritime Containers, L.P. | |
| Represented By: | George Alexander Croton |
| Represented By: | John D. Giffin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
