Murphy v. The Finish Line, Inc.
| Zachary Murphy |
| THE FINISH LINE, INC. |
| 3:2020cv05663 |
| August 13, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Jacqueline Scott Corley |
| William H Orrick |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1446 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
ORDER by Judge William H. Orrick denying #6 Motion to Remand. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2020)
|
|
Filing 16
CLERKS NOTICE SETTING ZOOM HEARING. The Motion Hearing set for 10/7/2020 will begin at 02:30 PM and will be held via Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/who General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recordi ng, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.us courts.gov/zoom/. (Related documents(s) #6 ) (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/1/2020)
|
|
Filing 15
REPLY (re #6 MOTION to Remand Action to State Court ) filed byZachary Murphy. (Bekam, Fawn) (Filed on 9/15/2020)
|
|
Filing 14
OPPOSITION/RESPONSE to (re #6 MOTION to Remand Action to State Court ) filed by The Finish Line, Inc.. (Isaacs, Andrea) (Filed on 9/8/2020)
|
|
Filing 13
CLERK'S NOTICE - Reset Deadlines as to #6 MOTION to Remand Action to State Court. Motion Hearing reset for 10/7/2020 02:00 PM before Judge William H. Orrick. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2020)
|
|
Filing 12
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ORDER - Case Management Conference set for 11/10/2020 02:00 PM. Case Management Statement due by 11/3/2020. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 08/31/2020. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2020)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge William H. Orrick for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by Clerk on 08/31/2020. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2020)
|
|
Filing 10
CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/28/2020)
|
|
Filing 9
CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Zachary Murphy.. (Bekam, Fawn) (Filed on 8/28/2020)
|
|
Filing 8
CLERK'S NOTICE CONTINUING MOTION HEARING. Please take notice the hearing on Plaintiff's #6 Motion to Remand Action to State Court is continued to 10/1/2020 at 9:00 a.m. by video conference before Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. Response due by 9/8/2020. Replies due by 9/14/2020. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2020)
|
|
Filing 7
CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs and Defendants shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 9/8/2020. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2020)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION to Remand Action to State Court filed by Zachary Murphy. Motion Hearing set for 9/24/2020 09:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom E, 15th Floor before Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. Responses due by 9/8/2020. Replies due by 9/15/2020. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proposed Order)(Bekam, Fawn) (Filed on 8/24/2020)
|
|
Filing 5
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by The Finish Line, Inc. of re #1 Notice of Removal, re 3 Case Assigned by Intake, re #2 Certificate of Interested Entities and Corporate Disclosure Statement (Isaacs, Andrea) (Filed on 8/18/2020)
|
|
Filing 4
Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Joint Case Management Statement due by 11 /5/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/12/2020 at 1:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom E, 15th Floor. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/14/2020)
|
|
Answer to Removal Complaint (Defendant The Finish Line, Inc.'s Answer to Plaintiff's First Amended Class Action Complaint - Refer to Docket# 1-7, Page 2) by The Finish Line, Inc.. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2020)
|
|
Filing 3
Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 8/27/2020. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2020)
|
|
Filing 2
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT [FRCP 7.1] and CERTIFICATION OF INTERESTED ENTITIES OR PERSONS [LC 3-15] filed by THE FINISH LINE, INC. identifying Corporate Parent JD Sports Fashion PLC for THE FINISH LINE, INC. re #1 Notice of Removal (Isaacs, Andrea) (Filed on 8/13/2020)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Alameda County Superior Court. Their case number is RG20061596. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0971-14812629). Filed byTHE FINISH LINE, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Class Action Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Summons, #3 Exhibit C - Civil Case Cover Sheet, #4 Exhibit D - Plaintiff's Service re Notice of Ruling, #5 Exhibit E - Answer to Class Action Complaint, #6 Exhibit F - First Amended Complaint, #7 Exhibit G - Answer to First Amended Complaint, #8 Exhibit H - Notice of Resetting Complex Det. Hearing, #9 Civil Cover Sheet)(Isaacs, Andrea) (Filed on 8/13/2020)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
