Gudgel v. The Clorox Company
Plaintiff: Shana Gudgel
Defendant: The Clorox Company
Case Number: 4:2020cv05712
Filed: August 14, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Phyllis J Hamilton
Referring Judge: Kandis A Westmore
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 8, 2020 Filing 26 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint filed by The Clorox Company. Motion Hearing set for 12/9/2020 09:00 AM in Oakland, Courtroom 3, 3rd Floor before Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton. Responses due by 11/5/2020. Replies due by 11/19/2020. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Emilie Labadie, #2 Exhibit A to Declaration of Emilie Labadie, #3 Proposed Order)(Henn, Emily) (Filed on 10/8/2020)
September 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER GRANTING #18 STIPULATION TO ENLARGE TIME TO BRIEF FORTHCOMING MOTION TO DISMISS by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton.(pjhlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/15/2020)
September 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Joint Case Management Statement due by 12/10/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/17/2020 at 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 3, 3rd Floor. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 9/11/2020. (kcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/11/2020)
September 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore no longer assigned to case, Signed by the Clerk on 9/10/2020. (anjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/10/2020)
September 10, 2020 Filing 22 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (dtmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/10/2020)
September 10, 2020 Filing 21 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by The Clorox Company.. (Henn, Emily) (Filed on 9/10/2020)
September 4, 2020 Filing 20 Refund Status re #12 Application for Refund Approved. (rghS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/4/2020)
September 3, 2020 Filing 19 CLERK'S NOTICE TO DEFENDANT Re: Consent or Declination: Defendant shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 9/17/2020. (dtmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/3/2020)
September 3, 2020 Filing 18 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re Enlarging Time to Respond to Complaint and to Brief Forthcoming Motion to Dismiss filed by The Clorox Company, Shana Gudgel. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Emily Johnson Henn)(Henn, Emily) (Filed on 9/3/2020) Modified on 9/4/2020 (bnsS, COURT STAFF).
September 3, 2020 Filing 17 Rule 7.1 Disclosures by The Clorox Company (Henn, Emily) (Filed on 9/3/2020)
September 3, 2020 Filing 16 Certificate of Interested Entities by The Clorox Company (Henn, Emily) (Filed on 9/3/2020)
September 3, 2020 Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Kathryn Elizabeth Cahoy on behalf of Defendant The Clorox Company (Cahoy, Kathryn) (Filed on 9/3/2020)
September 3, 2020 Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Ashley Margaret Simonsen on behalf of Defendant The Clorox Company (Simonsen, Ashley) (Filed on 9/3/2020)
September 3, 2020 Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Emily Johnson Henn on behalf of Defendant The Clorox Company (Henn, Emily) (Filed on 9/3/2020)
September 2, 2020 Filing 12 Application for Refund, Receipt Number 0971-14817348 by Shana Gudgel. (Levinson, Daniel) (Filed on 9/2/2020)
August 31, 2020 Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Shana Gudgel (Levinson, Daniel) (Filed on 8/31/2020)
August 27, 2020 Filing 10 Refund Status re #9 Application for Refund Declined. (rghS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/27/2020)
August 26, 2020 Filing 9 Application for Refund, Receipt Number 0971-14817379 by Shana Gudgel. (Levinson, Daniel) (Filed on 8/26/2020)
August 20, 2020 Filing 8 Refund Status re #6 Application for Refund Declined. (rghS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2020)
August 18, 2020 Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Shana Gudgel.. (Levinson, Daniel) (Filed on 8/18/2020)
August 17, 2020 Filing 6 Application for Refund, Receipt Number unknown by Shana Gudgel. (Levinson, Daniel) (Filed on 8/17/2020)
August 17, 2020 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to The Clorox Company. (jjbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/17/2020)
August 17, 2020 Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 11/24/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/1/2020 01:30 PM. (jjbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/17/2020)
August 14, 2020 Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 8/28/2020. (anjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/14/2020)
August 14, 2020 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Levinson, Daniel) (Filed on 8/14/2020)
August 14, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against The Clorox Company ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-14817395.). Filed byShana Gudgel. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Levinson, Daniel) (Filed on 8/14/2020) Modified on 9/10/2020 (anjS, COURT STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gudgel v. The Clorox Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shana Gudgel
Represented By: Daniel Saul Levinson
Represented By: Justin Richard Stockton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Clorox Company
Represented By: Ashley Margaret Simonsen
Represented By: Emily Johnson Henn
Represented By: Kathryn Elizabeth Cahoy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?