Ryan v. Trump et al
Patrick S. Ryan |
Donald J. Trump and Wilbur L. Ross |
Electronic Frontier Foundation |
3:2020cv05948 |
August 24, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Vince Chhabria |
Sallie Kim |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 31 Order by Judge Vince Chhabria granting #25 Motion to Remove Incorrectly Filed Document.(vclc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2020) |
Filing 30 Order by Judge Vince Chhabria denying #12 Application for Temporary Restraining Order.(vclc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/15/2020) |
Filing 29 CLERK'S NOTICE vacating the hearing scheduled for 9/15/2020, re #12 Motion for Ex Parte Application and Motion for TRO. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2020) |
Filing 28 NOTICE by Wilbur L. Ross, Donald J. Trump Regarding Implementation of Executive Order 13942 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Drezner, Michael) (Filed on 9/14/2020) |
Filing 27 REPLY Memorandum of Law in Further Support (re #12 Ex Parte MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order) filed by Patrick S. Ryan. (Ryan, Patrick) (Filed on 9/12/2020) Modified on 9/14/2020 (slhS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 26 Order by Judge Vince Chhabria granting #24 Motion for Leave to File Amicus Curiae Brief.(vclc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/11/2020) Modified on 10/7/2020 (knmS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 25 MOTION to Remove Incorrectly Filed Document filed by Electronic Frontier Foundation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Greene, David) (Filed on 9/11/2020) |
Filing 24 MOTION for Leave to File Correction of Docket #22 filed by Electronic Frontier Foundation. (Greene, David) (Filed on 9/11/2020) Modified on 10/7/2020 (knmS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 23 Order by Judge Vince Chhabria granting #13 Motion for Pro Hac Vice - Lovi.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/10/2020) |
Filing 22 *** MAIN DOCUMENT REMOVED BY ORDER OF COURT , SEE #31 . *** ***erroneous entry, please see #24*** MOTION for Leave to File Amicus Brief filed by Electronic Frontier Foundation. (Attachments: #1 amicus brief, #2 Proposed Order)(Greene, David) (Filed on 9/10/2020) Modified on 9/11/2020 (hdjS, COURT STAFF). (Main Document 22 replaced on 10/7/2020) (fff, COURT STAFF). Modified on 10/7/2020 (fff, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 21 Amicus Curiae APPEARANCE entered by David A Greene on behalf of Electronic Frontier Foundation. (Greene, David) (Filed on 9/10/2020) |
Filing 20 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #12 Ex Parte MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order Ex Parte Application ) filed byWilbur L. Ross, Donald J. Trump. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - ASPI, TikTok and WeChat: Curating and Controlling Global Information Flows, Policy Brief, Report No. 37 (Sept. 2020), #2 Exhibit 2 - HPSCI, Investigative Rep. on the U.S. Natl Sec. Issues Posed by Chinese Telecomms. Cos. Huawei and ZTE (Oct. 8, 2012), #3 Exhibit 3 - Staff of U.S.-China Commn, 112th Cong., The Natl Sec. Implications of Inv. and Products from the Peoples Republic of China in the Telecomms. Sector (2011), #4 Exhibit 4 - U.S.-China Commn, 112th Cong., 2011 Rep. to Congress, #5 Exhibit 5 - Daniel R. Coats, Dir. of Natl Intelligence (DNI), Stmt. for the Record: Worldwide Threat Assessment of the US Intelligence Cmty. (2018), #6 Exhibit 6 - U.S.-China Commn, 115th Cong., 2017 Rep. to Congress (Nov. 2017), #7 Exhibit 7 - FBI, Counterintelligence Strategic Pship Intelligence Note, SPIN: 15-002 (Feb. 1, 2015), #8 Exhibit 8 - Open Hearing on Worldwide Threats Before the SSCI, 115th Cong., #9 Exhibit 9 - DoD Summary of 2018 Natl Def. Strategy, #10 Exhibit 10 - Joint Statement, #11 Exhibit 11 - Murray Scot Tanner, Beijings New National Intelligence Law: From Defense to Offense, Lawfare, July 20, 2017, #12 Exhibit 12 - Letter, #13 Exhibit 13 - ASPI, Mapping More of Chinas Tech Giants, Issue Paper, Report No. 15 (Nov. 2019), #14 Exhibit 14 - TikTok Tracked User Data Using Tactic Banned by Google, Wall Street Journal (Aug. 11, 2020), #15 Exhibit 15 - TikTok Agrees to $1.1 Million Deal in Kids Privacy Suit, Bloomberg (Dec. 6, 2019), #16 Exhibit 16 - Class-Action Lawsuit Claims TikTok Steals Kids Data And Sends It To China, NPR (Aug. 4, 2020), #17 Exhibit 17 - TikTok Privacy Policy, #18 Exhibit 18 - TikTok Terms of Service)(Robinson, Stuart) (Filed on 9/10/2020) |
Filing 19 NOTICE of Appearance by Serena M Orloff (Orloff, Serena) (Filed on 9/10/2020) |
Filing 18 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Drezner (Drezner, Michael) (Filed on 9/10/2020) |
Filing 17 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Patrick S. Ryan re #14 Order, (Ryan, Patrick) (Filed on 9/9/2020) |
Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Stuart Justin Robinson (Robinson, Stuart) (Filed on 9/9/2020) |
Filing 15 CLERK'S NOTICE PROVIDING ZOOM ACCESS AND REQUIRING ADVANCE REGISTRATION OF COUNSEL FOR THE 9/15/2020 MOTION HEARING. Motion Hearing set for 9/15/2020, 09:00 AM, before Judge Vince Chhabria. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/vc Court Appearances: Advance d notice is required of counsel or parties who wish to be identified by the court as making an appearance or will be participating in the argument at the hearing. A list of names and emails must be sent to the CRD at vccrd@cand.uscourts.gov no later than Monday, September 14, 2020, at 10:00 a.m.General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. Motion Hearing set for 9/15/2020, 09:00 AM, before Judge Vince Chhabria. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/8/2020) |
Filing 14 ORDER re #12 Ex Parte MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order Ex Parte Application filed by Patrick S. Ryan. Response due 9/10/2020. Reply due 9/12/2020. Hearing set for 9/15/2020. Ryan ordered to serve defendants with this order no later than 9/9/2020. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 9/8/2020. (vclc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/8/2020) |
Filing 13 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-14915170.) filed by Patrick S. Ryan. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(Ryan, Patrick) (Filed on 9/8/2020) |
Filing 12 Ex Parte MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by Patrick S. Ryan. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Patrick S. Ryan, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Proposed Order)(Ryan, Patrick) (Filed on 9/5/2020) |
Filing 11 ORDER RE MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 9/4/2020. (vclc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/4/2020) |
Filing 10 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Patrick S. Ryan. Responses due by 9/17/2020. Replies due by 9/24/2020. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Ryan Declaration, #2 Exhibit Complaint)(Ryan, Patrick) (Filed on 9/3/2020) |
Filing 9 REASSIGNED CASE - NOTICE OF NEW HEARING DATE: You are notified that the Court has scheduled an Initial Case Management Conference before Judge Vince Chhabria upon reassignment. For a copy of Judge Chhabria's Standing Order and other information, please refer to the Court's website at www.cand.uscourts.gov. Case Management Statement due by 11/17/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/24/2020, 02:00 PM. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/vc Court Appearances: Advanced notice is required of counsel or parties who wish to be identified by the court as making an appearance or will be participating in the argument at the hearing. A list of names and emails must be sent to the CRD at vccrd@cand.uscourts.gov no later than Not less than 3 court days in advance of the hearing.General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. Case Management St atement due by 11/17/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/24/2020, 02:00 PM. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2020) |
Filing 8 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Vince Chhabria for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by Clerk on 08/31/2020. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2020) |
Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/28/2020) |
Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Patrick S. Ryan.. (Ryan, Patrick) (Filed on 8/28/2020) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Wilbur L. Ross, Donald J. Trump, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (hdjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/25/2020) |
Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 11/16/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/23/2020 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom C, 15th Floor. (hdjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2020) |
Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 9/8/2020. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2020) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Ryan, Patrick) (Filed on 8/24/2020) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Wilbur L. Ross, Donald J. Trump ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-14853779.). Filed byPatrick S. Ryan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ryan, Patrick) (Filed on 8/24/2020) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.