Berry v. Monsanto Company
| Edward J. Berry |
| Monsanto Company |
| 3:2020cv05963 |
| August 25, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Vince Chhabria |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand byMonsanto Company. (Hollingsworth, Joe) (Filed on 9/15/2020) |
| Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Monsanto Company identifying Other Affiliate Bayer AG for Monsanto Company. (Hollingsworth, Joe) (Filed on 9/15/2020) |
| Filing 9 Certificate of Interested Entities by Monsanto Company identifying Other Affiliate Bayer AG for Monsanto Company. (Hollingsworth, Joe) (Filed on 9/15/2020) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Megan L Odom (Odom, Megan) (Filed on 8/27/2020) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Aaron Sacchet (Sacchet, Michael) (Filed on 8/27/2020) |
| Filing 6 Case Transferred in from United States District Court for the District of New Mexico (Albuquerque); Case Number 1:20-cv-00643-JHR-SCY. Original File, Certified Copy of Transfer Order and Docket Sheet Received. |
| MEMBER CASE OPENED re 16-md-02741-VC: United States District Court for the District of New Mexico (Albuquerque), 1:20-cv-00643-JHR-SCY, Edward J. Berry, Jr. v. Monsanto Company, Opened in California Northern District as 3:20-cv-05963-VC pursuant to Conditional Transfer Order (CTO-228) cc: JPMDL (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/25/2020) |
| Filing 5 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-228) by JPML (certified copy) transferring this matter to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1407; assigned to the Honorable Vince Chhabria (MDL 2741). (kg) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Edward J. Berry. Monsanto Company served on 7/30/2020, answer due 8/20/2020. (Houliston, David) |
| Summons Issued as to Monsanto Company. (arp) |
| Filing 3 APPENDIX/SUPPLEMENT re #1 Complaint by Edward J. Berry (Houliston, David) |
| Filing 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (dr) |
| United States Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter and United States Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough assigned. (dr) |
| Filing 1 OMPLAINT and Jury Demand against Monsanto Company, (Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Edward J. Berry, Jr. (Houliston, David) |
| Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 400 receipt number ANMDC-7192643 re #1 Complaint filed by Edward J. Berry, Jr. (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Houliston, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
