Powlick v. Monsanto Company
| Robert J. Powlick |
| Monsanto Company |
| 3:2020cv06122 |
| August 31, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Vince Chhabria |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand byMonsanto Company. (Hollingsworth, Joe) (Filed on 10/28/2020) |
| Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Monsanto Company identifying Other Affiliate Bayer AG for Monsanto Company. (Hollingsworth, Joe) (Filed on 10/28/2020) |
| Filing 9 Certificate of Interested Entities by Monsanto Company identifying Other Affiliate Bayer AG for Monsanto Company. (Hollingsworth, Joe) (Filed on 10/28/2020) |
| Filing 8 Case transferred in from District of Florida Middle; Case Number 8:20-cv-01750. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| MEMBER CASE OPENED: Middle District of Florida, 8:20-cv-01750, Powlick v. Monsanto Company, Opened in California Northern District as 3:20-cv-6122-VC pursuant to Conditional Transfer Order #7 cc: JPMDL (slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2020) |
| Filing 7 MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION panel order (CTO-230) transferring case to: Northern District of California re: MDL case number: 2741. (AG) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #4 Related case order and track 2 notice by Robert J. Powlick. (Chambers, G.) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #4 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Robert J. Powlick. Related case(s): yes (Chambers, G.) |
Filing 4
RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Counsel and any unrepresented party shall meet within sixty days after service of the complaint upon any defendant for the purpose of preparing and filing a Case Management Report. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 8/4/2020. (SAO)
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to Monsanto Company. (CRH) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge William F. Jung and Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed. New case number: 8:20-cv-1750-T-02JSS. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Monsanto Company with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-17117778) filed by Robert J. Powlick. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Chambers, G.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Powlick v. Monsanto Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Monsanto Company | |
| Represented By: | Eric Gordon Lasker |
| Represented By: | Joe G. Hollingsworth |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Robert J. Powlick | |
| Represented By: | Genevieve Katherine Chambers |
| Represented By: | T. Michael Morgan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
