Loza v. Intel Americas, Inc.
Plaintiff: Thomas Loza
Defendant: Intel Americas, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2020cv06705
Filed: September 24, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: William Alsup
Referring Judge: Nathanael M Cousins
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 704
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 15 Certificate of Interested Entities by Intel Americas, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Intel Corporation for Intel Americas, Inc.. and Corporate Disclosure (Jang, Scott) (Filed on 11/16/2020)
November 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Intel Americas, Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 12/17/2020 08:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 12, 19th Floor before Judge William Alsup. Responses due by 11/25/2020. Replies due by 12/2/2020. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Scott Jang and Request for Judicial Notice, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Proposed Order)(Jang, Scott) (Filed on 11/11/2020)
October 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Thomas Loza. Intel Americas, Inc. served on 10/21/2020, answer due 11/12/2020. (Martoccio, Gary) (Filed on 10/27/2020)
October 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ON REASSIGNMENT. The Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/23/2020 is continued to 1/21/2021 at 11:00 AM before Judge William Alsup. Case Management Statement due by 1/14/2021. Standing orders can be downloaded from the Court's webpage at www.cand.uscourts.gov/whaorders. This proceeding will be held by AT&T Conference Line. The court circulates the following conference number to allow the equivalent of a public hearing by telephone.For conference line information, see: https://apps.cand.uscourts.gov/telhrg/ All counsel, members of the public and press please use the following dial-in information below to access the conference line: Dial In: (888) 684-8852Access Code: 3707514The Court may be in session with proceedings in progress when you connect to the conference line. Therefore, mute your phone if possible and wait for the Court to address you before speaking on the line. For call clarity, parties shall NOT use speaker phone or earpieces for these calls, and where at all possible, parties shall use landlines.PLEASE NOTE: Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited. See General Order 58 at Paragraph III. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)(amd2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2020)
October 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Summons Issued as to Intel Americas, Inc. (arkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2020)
October 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Case REASSIGNED to Judge William Alsup. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins no longer assigned to case. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording) (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2020)
October 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 This case will be randomly reassigned to a District Judge outside the San Jose Division pursuant to the Caseload Rebalancing Pilot Program approved by the Court effective March 1, 2018. For information, visit our web page at #http://cand.uscourts.gov/news/225. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2020)
October 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/6/2020)
October 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Thomas Loza.. (Martoccio, Gary) (Filed on 10/6/2020)
October 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Proposed Summons. (Martoccio, Gary) (Filed on 10/6/2020)
September 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER GRANTING #3 APPLICATION for Admission of Attorney Gary J. Martoccio Pro Hac Vice representing Thomas Loza. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/25/2020)
September 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 12/16 /2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/23/2020 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 5, 4th Floor. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/25/2020)
September 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice for Gary J. Martoccio ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-14986158.) filed by Thomas Loza. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Martoccio, Gary) (Filed on 9/25/2020)
September 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 10/8/2020. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/24/2020)
September 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Intel Americas, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-14984053.). Filed byThomas Loza. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Daniels, David) (Filed on 9/24/2020)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Loza v. Intel Americas, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Intel Americas, Inc.
Represented By: Scott Philip Jang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Thomas Loza
Represented By: David Merrill Daniels
Represented By: Gary Martoccio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?