Boulder Valley School District v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
| Boulder Valley School District |
| James Monsees, Altria Enterprises LLC, Adam Bowen, Altria Client Services LLC, Altria Group Distribution Company, Riaz Valani, Altria Group Inc., Juul Labs Inc., Nicholas Pritzker and Hoyoung Huh |
| 3:2020cv06771 |
| September 29, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| William H Orrick |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Boulder Valley School District. All Defendants served on 10/27/20, answer due 11/17/20. (Byrd, Kenneth) (Filed on 11/5/2020) Modified on 11/5/2020 (mclS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 12
Order by Judge William H. Orrick granting #10 Motion for Pro Hac Vice by Kenneth S. Byrd. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/30/2020)
|
|
Filing 11
Order by Judge William H. Orrick granting #7 Motion for Pro Hac Vice by Mark P. Chalos. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/30/2020)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-15116439.) filed by Boulder Valley School District. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(Byrd, Kenneth) (Filed on 10/27/2020) |
| Filing 9 Summons Issued as to Altria Client Services LLC, Altria Enterprises LLC, Altria Group Distribution Company, Altria Group Inc., Adam Bowen, Hoyoung Huh, Juul Labs Inc., James Monsees, Nicholas Pritzker, Riaz Valani. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2020) |
| Filing 8 Proposed Summons. (Shaver, Anne) (Filed on 10/22/2020) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-15097482.) filed by Boulder Valley School District. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(Chalos, Mark) (Filed on 10/22/2020) |
| Filing 6 Case transferred in from District of Colorado; Case Number 1:20-cv-02797. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| MEMBER CASE OPENED: MDL 2913, District of Colorado, 1:20-cv-02797 NYW, Boulder Valley School District v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al, Opened in California Northern District as 3:20-cv-06771 WHO pursuant to Conditional Transfer Order 41 cc: JPMDL (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2020) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFIED COPY OF (THE CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER CTO-41) from the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation pursuant to 28 USC 1407, transferring from the District of Colorado, 20-cv-02797 NYW, to The Northern District of California, to become part of MDL 2913, by Clerk on 9/28/2020. (evana, ) |
| Filing 4 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. No Summons Issued (cpomm, ) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Text Only Entry (cpomm, ) |
| Filing 2 Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number COX096431 (cpomm, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Altria Client Services LLC, Altria Enterprises, LLC, Altria Group Distribution Company, Altria Group, Inc., Adam Bowen, Hoyoung Huh, Juul Labs, Inc., James Monsees, Nicholas Pritzker, Riaz Valani (Filing fee $ 400).Attorney Anne B. Shaver added to party Boulder Valley School District(pty:pla), filed by Boulder Valley School District. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Shaver, Anne) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
