The Board of Trustees, v. Diverse Facility Solutions, Inc.
The Board of Trustees |
Diverse Facility Solutions, Inc. |
3:2020cv06804 |
September 30, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Sallie Kim |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by The Board of Trustees.. (Mainguy, Tracy) (Filed on 10/19/2020) |
Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 10/30/2020. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/16/2020) |
Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 12/28/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/4/2020 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom C, 15th Floor. (elyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/1/2020) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Diverse Facility Solutions, Inc. (elyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2020) |
Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 10/14/2020. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2020) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Mainguy, Tracy) (Filed on 9/30/2020) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Diverse Facility Solutions, Inc.( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-15004016.). Filed The Board of Trustees, in their capacities as Trustees of the California Service Employees Health and Welfare Trust Fund. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Mainguy, Tracy) (Filed on 9/30/2020) Modified on 9/30/2020 (elyS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: The Board of Trustees, v. Diverse Facility Solutions, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Diverse Facility Solutions, Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: The Board of Trustees | |
Represented By: | Tracy Lynn Mainguy |
Represented By: | Concepcion E. Lozano-Batista |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.