United States of America v. NEATO ROBOTICS, INC
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: NEATO ROBOTICS, INC
Case Number: 3:2020cv06873
Filed: October 1, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Jacqueline Scott Corley
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 15, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by United States of America (Cosentino, Michael) (Filed on 10/15/2020)
October 6, 2020 Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Joint Case Management Statement due by 12/31/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/7/2021 at 1:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom E, 15th Floor. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/6/2020)
October 6, 2020 #Electronic filing error. Re: #2 Proposed Summons filed by United States of America. Used Incorrect Summons Form. This filing will not be processed by the clerks office. Please re-file in its entirety by using the AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/6/2020)
October 6, 2020 #Electronic filing error. Case has been randomly assigned to Judge, however, incorrect Civil Cover sheet used at case opening of JS-44 (Rev 12/12) (CAND rev 1/13/13). Please complete correct civil Cover Sheet of JS-CAND 44 (Rev. 10/2020) and file as a separate docket entry re #1 . #1 Complaint filed by United States of America (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/6/2020)
October 5, 2020 Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 10/19/2020. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2020)
October 5, 2020 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Cosentino, Michael) (Filed on 10/5/2020)
October 5, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Neato Robotics, Inc. Filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #(1) Exhibit, #(2) Civil Cover Sheet)(Cosentino, Michael) (Filed on 10/5/2020) Modified on 10/6/2020 (tnS, COURT STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. NEATO ROBOTICS, INC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NEATO ROBOTICS, INC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Michael Cosentino
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?