Benson v. Juul Labs Inc. et al
| Kimberly Benson |
| Chevron Corporation, Core-Mark Holding Company, Inc., Nicholas Pritzker, eliquidtech, Inc., Hoyoung Huh, Tobacco Technology, Inc., Altria Group Inc., Alternative Ingredients Inc, Walmart, 7-Eleven Inc., Circle K Stores Inc., Philip Morris USA Inc, Altria Enterprises LLC, Adam Bowen, Altria Client Services LLC, Riaz Valani, Eby-Brown Company, LLC, Juul Labs Inc., James Monsees, Altria Group Distribution Company, McLane Company, Inc., Mother Murphys Labs, Inc. and Alternative Ingredients Inc. |
| 3:2020cv06885 |
| October 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| William H Orrick |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Kimberly Benson re #4 Summons Issued,, Proof of Service (Marshall, Patrick) (Filed on 10/26/2020) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Kimberly Benson re #4 Summons Issued,, Proof of Service (Marshall, Patrick) (Filed on 10/26/2020) |
| #Electronic filing error. Incorrect event used for summons returned executed. [err101]This filing will not be processed by the clerks office. Re: #6 Certificate of Service filed b y Kimberly Benson (arkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/26/2020) |
| #Electronic filing error. Incorrect event used. [err101]This filing will not be processed by the clerks office.Please re-file in its entirety. Re: #5 Certificate of Service filed by Kimberly Benson (arkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/26/2020) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to 7-Eleven Inc., Alternative Ingredients Inc, Altria Client Services LLC, Altria Enterprises LLC, Altria Group Distribution Company, Altria Group Inc., Adam Bowen, Chevron Corporation, Circle K Stores Inc., Core-Mark Holding Company, Inc., Eby-Brown Company, LLC, Hoyoung Huh, Juul Labs Inc., McLane Company, Inc., James Monsees, Mother Murphys Labs, Inc., Philip Morris USA Inc, Nicholas Pritzker, Tobacco Technology, Inc., Riaz Valani, Walmart, eliquidtech, Inc. (arkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2020) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge William H. Orrick. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2020) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Service List)(Marshall, Patrick) (Filed on 10/2/2020) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Short Form Complaint against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-15015207.). Filed byKimberly Benson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Marshall, Patrick) (Filed on 10/2/2020) |
| DIRECT FILE MEMBER CASE OPENED MDL 2913: Opened in California Northern District as 3:20-cv-06885-WHO pursuant to Conditional Transfer Order cc: JPMDL (arkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2020) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
