Garcia v. Roadrunner Transportation Services, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Julian Garcia
Defendant: Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc. and Roadrunner Transportation Services, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2020cv06918
Filed: October 5, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Maxine M Chesney
Referring Judge: Donna M Ryu
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE. The application of Charles Andrewscavage is granted. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 21, 2020. (mmclc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2020)
October 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPIES. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 21, 2020. (mmclc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2020)
October 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/22/2021 at 10:30 AM in Telephone Conference Only. The Court will initiate the call. Counsel participating in the conference call are directed to email their name and direct phone number to: mmccrd@cand.uscourts.gov. Due to multiple hearings, counsel are advised to be on telephone stand-by from 10:30 AM until called by the Court. A Joint Case Management Statement due by 1/15/2021. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 10/20/2020. (lsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/20/2020)
October 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Maxine M. Chesney for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu no longer assigned to case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by Clerk on 10/20/2020. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/20/2020)
October 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2020)
October 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Julian Garcia.. (Pogrel, David) (Filed on 10/19/2020)
October 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Roadrunner Transportation Services, Inc., Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc... (Smedstad, Adam) (Filed on 10/19/2020)
October 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-15075258.) filed by Roadrunner Transportation Services, Inc., Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc.. (Andrewscavage, Charles) (Filed on 10/16/2020)
October 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 12/30/20 20. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/6/2021 01:30 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor. (cjlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/6/2020)
October 5, 2020 Opinion or Order #1 Answer to Removal Complaint with jury demand by Roadrunner Transportation Services, Inc., Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc. (cjlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2020)
October 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 10/19/2020. (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2020)
October 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Roadrunner Transportation Services, Inc., Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc. for Roadrunner Transportation Services, Inc.. (Smedstad, Adam) (Filed on 10/5/2020)
October 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (with jury demand by both) from Superior Court of California, County of Alameda. Their case number is RG20061917. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0971-15023811). Filed by Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc., Roadrunner Transportation Services, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-U of Defendants' Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit V of Defendants' Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Smedstad, Adam) (Filed on 10/5/2020) Modified on 10/6/2020 (cjlS, COURT STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Garcia v. Roadrunner Transportation Services, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc.
Represented By: Adam Carl Smedstad
Represented By: Christopher Chad McNatt, Jr.
Represented By: James Anthony Eckhart
Represented By: Charles Andrewscavage
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Roadrunner Transportation Services, Inc.
Represented By: Adam Carl Smedstad
Represented By: Christopher Chad McNatt, Jr.
Represented By: James Anthony Eckhart
Represented By: Charles Andrewscavage
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Julian Garcia
Represented By: David Philip Pogrel
Represented By: Aaron D. Kaufmann
Represented By: Giselle Olmedo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?