Pahalad v. Saul
Romika Pahalad |
Andrew M. Saul |
3:2020cv06934 |
October 5, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Thomas S Hixson |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1383 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Civil Cover Sheet by Romika Pahalad Re Complaint. (Sackett, Harvey) (Filed on 10/24/2020) |
Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Andrew M. Saul.. (Naicker, Tina) (Filed on 10/13/2020) |
Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Romika Pahalad.. (Sackett, Harvey) (Filed on 10/9/2020) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Andrew M. Saul, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General (elyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2020) |
Summons and Waiver emailed to SSA and DOJ email addresses. (elyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2020) |
Filing 5 SOCIAL SECURITY PROCEDURAL ORDER (elyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/6/2020) |
Filing 4 ORDER by Judge Thomas S. Hixson granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/6/2020) |
Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 10/19/2020. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2020) |
Filing 2 First MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis IFP filed by Romika Pahalad. (Sackett, Harvey) (Filed on 10/5/2020) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT For Judicial Review of Decision of Commissioner of Social Security against Andrew M. Saul. Filed byRomika Pahalad. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sackett, Harvey) (Filed on 10/5/2020) |
#Electronic filing error. Case has been randomly assigned to judge, however incorrect Civil Cover Sheet JS CAND 44 (Rev. 07/19) used at case opening. Please complete correct Civil Cover Sheet JS-CAND 44 (Rev. 10/2020) and file as a separate docket entry re Compliant #1 . #1 filed by Romika Pahalad (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2020) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Pahalad v. Saul | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Romika Pahalad | |
Represented By: | Harvey Peter Sackett |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul | |
Represented By: | Tina Laxmi Naicker |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.