Hua v. Hartford Life and Accident Assurance Company
Plaintiff: Thuy Hua
Defendant: Hartford Life and Accident Assurance Company
Case Number: 3:2020cv07084
Filed: October 9, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Sallie Kim
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 3, 2020 Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Defendant shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 12/17/2020. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/3/2020)
December 2, 2020 Filing 7 STIPULATION to Extend Time to Respond to the Complaint filed by Hartford Life and Accident Assurance Company. (Rucker, Cindy) (Filed on 12/2/2020)
October 22, 2020 Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Thuy Hua.. (Keenley, James) (Filed on 10/22/2020)
October 14, 2020 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Hartford Life and Accident Assurance Company. (elyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2020)
October 14, 2020 Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 1/4/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/11/2021 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom C, 15th Floor. (elyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2020)
October 9, 2020 Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 10/23/2020. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/9/2020)
October 9, 2020 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Keenley, James) (Filed on 10/9/2020)
October 9, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Hartford Life and Accident Assurance Company ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-15048607.). Filed byThuy Hua. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Keenley, James) (Filed on 10/9/2020)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hua v. Hartford Life and Accident Assurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Thuy Hua
Represented By: James Pieper Keenley
Represented By: Emily A. Bolt
Represented By: Brian Henry Kim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hartford Life and Accident Assurance Company
Represented By: Cindy M. Rucker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?