Dolgov v. HDR Global Trading Limited et al
| Dmitry Dolgov |
| Ben Delo, HDR Global Trading Limited, Samuel Reed, Agata Maria Reed, Arthur Hayes, Barbara Reed, Trace Reed and ABS Global Trading Limited |
| 3:2020cv07140 |
| October 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| William H Orrick |
| Joseph C Spero |
| Securities/Commodities |
| 7 U.S.C. § 25 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER REGARDING RELATION AND CONSOLIDATION OF GABRIEL-RAZVAN ACTION. Matter to be consolidated with Lead Case No. 20-cv-03345-WHO. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 11/25/2020. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/25/2020)
|
|
Filing 14
Order by Judge William H. Orrick granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Complaint. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/5/2020)
|
| Filing 13 Case reassigned to Judge William H. Orrick. Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers no longer assigned to the case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/5/2020) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER RELATING CASE TO 3:20CV3345-WHO. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 11/5/2020. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/5/2020)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint,, filed by ABS Global Trading Limited, HDR Global Trading Limited. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Stephen D. Hibbard, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Proposed Order)(Hibbard, Stephen) (Filed on 11/4/2020) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER, Case Reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero no longer assigned to the case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by The Clerk on 10/26/20. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/26/2020)
|
| Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either ( X ) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/23/2020) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Dmitry Dolgov.. (Pogodin, Ph.D., Esq., Pavel) (Filed on 10/22/2020) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Dmitry Dolgov. ABS Global Trading Limited served on 10/20/2020, answer due 11/10/2020. (Pogodin, Ph.D., Esq., Pavel) (Filed on 10/22/2020) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Dmitry Dolgov. Agata Maria Reed served on 10/20/2020, answer due 11/10/2020; Samuel Reed served on 10/19/2020, answer due 11/9/2020. (Pogodin, Ph.D., Esq., Pavel) (Filed on 10/22/2020) |
| Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 1/8/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/15/2021 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom F, 15th Floor. (elyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/16/2020) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to ABS Global Trading Limited, Ben Delo, HDR Global Trading Limited, Arthur Hayes, Agata Maria Reed, Barbara Reed, Samuel Reed, and Trace Reed. (elyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/16/2020) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 10/28/2020. (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2020) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Pogodin, Ph.D., Esq., Pavel) (Filed on 10/14/2020) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR CONSPIRACY TO CONDUCT AND CONDUCTING ENTERPRISES AFFAIRS THROUGH A PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-15061107.). Filed byDmitry Dolgov. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6, #8 Exhibit 7, #9 Exhibit 8, #10 Exhibit 9, #11 Exhibit 10, #12 Exhibit 11, #13 Exhibit 12, #14 Exhibit 13, #15 Exhibit 14)(Pogodin, Ph.D., Esq., Pavel) (Filed on 10/14/2020) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
