Monroe v. Saul
| Sean Everett Monroe |
| Andrew Saul |
| 3:2020cv07295 |
| October 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Sallie Kim |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 SOCIAL SECURITY PROCEDURAL ORDER. (arkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/2/2020) |
| Filing 9 Summons Issued as to Andrew Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (arkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/2/2020) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/2/2020: #1 Summons CORRECTED) (arkS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 8 FEE PAID (Filing fee$400,receipt number 0971-15187905). (Zane, Helen) (Filed on 11/13/2020) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Sean Everett Monroe.. (Zane, Helen) (Filed on 11/9/2020) |
| Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 11/20/2020. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/6/2020) |
Filing 5
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis without prejudice. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2020)
|
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 10/30/2020. (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/16/2020) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Zane, Helen) (Filed on 10/16/2020) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Sean Monroe. (Zane, Helen) (Filed on 10/16/2020) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul Social Security Administration. Filed bySean Monroe. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Zane, Helen) (Filed on 10/16/2020) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Monroe v. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew Saul | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sean Everett Monroe | |
| Represented By: | Helen R Zane |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
