CMT Developers, LLC et. al. v. Towle et. al.
| CMT Developers, LLC and David Kramer |
| U.S. Capital Global Partners, LLC, Rick Owaki, U.S. Capital Partners, LLC, Ish Spencer and Charles Towle |
| 3:2020cv07579 |
| October 28, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Jacqueline Scott Corley |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1962 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Refund Status re #10 Application for Refund Approved. (rghS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/14/2020) |
| Filing 10 Application for Refund, Receipt Number 09711512577 by CMT Developers, LLC. (Evans, Ingrid) (Filed on 12/9/2020) |
| Filing 9 First MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice Asher Gulko ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number 0971-15289762.) filed by CMT Developers, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Letter of Good Standing to Pro Hav Vice Application)(Evans, Ingrid) (Filed on 12/8/2020) |
| Filing 8 Refund Status re #7 Application for Refund Declined. (rghS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/4/2020) |
| Filing 7 Application for Refund, Receipt Number 09711512577 by CMT Developers, LLC. (Evans, Ingrid) (Filed on 12/2/2020) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by CMT Developers, LLC.. (Evans, Ingrid) (Filed on 11/30/2020) |
| Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 11/30/2020. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2020) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Rick Owaki, Ish Spencer, Charles Towle, U.S. Capital Global Partners, LLC, U.S. Capital Partners, LLC. (jlgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/29/2020) |
| Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 1/21/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/28/2021 at 1:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom E, 15th Floor. (jlgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/29/2020) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 11/12/2020. (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/29/2020) |
| Filing 1 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0971-15125909). Filed by CMT Developers, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A to Complaint, #2 Exhibit Exhibits B and C to Complaint, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Notice of Interested Parties, #5 Summons Summons)(Evans, Ingrid) (Filed on 10/28/2020) Modified on 10/29/2020 (jlgS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
