Express Mobile, Inc. v. SAP SE et al
Express Mobile, Inc. |
SAP SE, SAP America, Inc. and SAP Labs, LLC |
3:2020cv08492 |
December 1, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Richard Seeborg |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. § 271 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 Certificate of Interested Entities by SAP America, Inc., SAP Labs, LLC, SAP SE identifying Corporate Parent SAP SE for SAP America, Inc., SAP Labs, LLC. (Batchelder, James) (Filed on 1/13/2021) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by James Lawrence Davis, Jr (Davis, James) (Filed on 1/13/2021) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by James R. Batchelder (Batchelder, James) (Filed on 1/13/2021) |
Filing 13 ORDER by Judge Richard Seeborg granting #12 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Steven J. Rizzi. (clS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2021) |
Filing 12 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice of Steven J. Rizzi ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number 0971-15406846.) filed by Express Mobile, Inc.. (Rizzi, Steven) (Filed on 1/6/2021) |
Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Express Mobile, Inc.. as to Defendant SAP SE (Miyar, Ramon) (Filed on 12/22/2020) |
Filing 10 STIPULATION to Extend Defendants' Deadline to File Responsive Pleading filed by Express Mobile, Inc.. (Miyar, Ramon) (Filed on 12/22/2020) |
Filing 9 COMPLAINT (Correction of Docket #1 ) against SAP America, Inc., SAP Labs, LLC, SAP SE. Filed by Express Mobile, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-H, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Miyar, Ramon) (Filed on 12/2/2020) |
Filing 8 REPORT on the filing of an action regarding patent infringement (cc: form mailed to register). (Attachments: #1 Complaint)(slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/2/2020) |
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to SAP America, Inc., SAP Labs, LLC, SAP SE. (slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/2/2020) |
Filing 6 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 2/25/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/4/2021 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 03, 17th Floor. (slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/2/2020) |
Filing 5 Case assigned to Judge Richard Seeborg. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (anjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/2/2020) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Pendency of Other Action Involving Same Patent by Express Mobile, Inc. (Miyar, Ramon) (Filed on 12/1/2020) |
Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Miyar, Ramon) (Filed on 12/1/2020) |
Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Express Mobile, Inc. re #1 Complaint (Miyar, Ramon) (Filed on 12/1/2020) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against SAP SE, SAP America, Inc., and SAP Labs, LLC (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0971-15261482). Filed by Express Mobile, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-H to Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Miyar, Ramon) (Filed on 12/1/2020) Modified on 12/2/2020 (slhS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.