Koltys v. Saul, et al.
| Henry Koltys |
| Chad F Wolf, Andrew M Saul, Andrew M. Saul and Chad F. Wolf |
| 3:2020cv08700 |
| December 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Sallie Kim |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Defendants shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 2/17/2021. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2021) |
| Filing 11 SECOND STIPULATION to Enlarge Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint filed by Andrew M. Saul, Chad F. Wolf. (Johann, Pamela) (Filed on 2/3/2021) Modified on 2/3/2021 (jlgS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Henry Koltys (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service Notice of Proof of Service - Wolf (Anderson), #2 Certificate/Proof of Service Notice of Proof of Service by Certified Mail - Saul (Barr), #3 Certificate/Proof of Service Notice of Proof of Service by Certified Mail - Wolf, #4 Certificate/Proof of Service Notice of Proof of Service by Certififed Mail - Wolf (Barr))(Herrick, Steven) (Filed on 1/28/2021) |
| Filing 9 STIPULATION to Extend Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint filed by Andrew M. Saul, Chad F. Wolf. (Johann, Pamela) (Filed on 1/15/2021) Modified on 1/19/2021 (jlgS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Henry Koltys.. (Herrick, Steven) (Filed on 12/22/2020) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Chad F. Wolf. (wsnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/17/2020) |
| Filing 6 Proposed Summons. (Herrick, Steven) (Filed on 12/10/2020) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Andrew M. Saul. (jlgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/10/2020) |
| Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 3/8/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/15/2021 at 1:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom C, 15th Floor. (jlgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/9/2020) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 12/23/2020. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/9/2020) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Herrick, Steven) (Filed on 12/9/2020) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $402, receipt number 0971-15294195). Filed by Henry Koltys. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits A-K, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Herrick, Steven) (Filed on 12/9/2020) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
