Vickers v. Matteson
Petitioner: Michael Esley Vickers
Respondent: Warden Giselle Matteson and Giselle Matteson
Interested Party: People of the State of California
Case Number: 3:2020cv08773
Filed: December 10, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: William Alsup
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 2, 2021 Filing 12 Motion to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corus Due to Ongoing State Proceedings filed by Giselle Matteson. Responses due by 2/16/2021. Replies due by 2/23/2021. (Swanson, Michele) (Filed on 2/2/2021)
February 2, 2021 Filing 11 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE to (re #2 MOTION to Stay) filed by Giselle Matteson. (Swanson, Michele) (Filed on 2/2/2021)
January 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER RE #9 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2021)
January 21, 2021 Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply Motion for Enlargement of Time to File Responses to the Petition and the Motion for a Stay filed by Giselle Matteson. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proposed Order)(Swanson, Michele) (Filed on 1/21/2021)
January 6, 2021 copy of re #8 order to show cause served via electronic mail to the Attorney General of the State of California (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2021)
January 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/5/2021)
December 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER, Case Reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge William Alsup for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler no longer assigned to the case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by The Clerk on 12/29/20. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/29/2020)
December 28, 2020 Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/28/2020)
December 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER. The petitioner has filed a motion to stay his petition under Rhines v. Weber, 544 U.S. 269 (2005). Both the petitioner and the respondent must consent to magistrate-judge jurisdiction for the undersigned to be able to decide the motion. Mitchell v. Valenzuela, 791 F.3d 1166 (9th Cir. 2015); see Williams v. King, 875 F.3d 500 (9th Cir. 2017). The court directs the parties, within seven days, to file a written consent or request reassignment to a district judge. See N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 73-1(a)(2). The forms are available at http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 12/17/2020. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (lblc5S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/17/2020)
December 10, 2020 Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 12/24/2020. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/10/2020)
December 10, 2020 Filing 2 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO REQUEST STAY AND ABEYANCE TO PERMIT PETITIONER TO EXHAUST UNEXHAUSTED CLAIMS filed by Michael Esley Vickers. Responses due by 12/24/2020. Replies due by 12/31/2020. (Beles, Robert) (Filed on 12/10/2020)
December 10, 2020 Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS; VERIFICATION; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES, (Filing Fee: $5.00, receipt number 0971-15302958). Filed by Michael Esley Vickers. (Attachments: #(1) Civil Cover Sheet)(Beles, Robert) (Filed on 12/10/2020)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vickers v. Matteson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: People of the State of California
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Giselle Matteson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Giselle Matteson
Represented By: Michele Joette Swanson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Michael Esley Vickers
Represented By: Robert Joseph Beles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?