In Re: Subpoena Dispute
John Kugel, Lawrence Rougier, Richard Hamilton, Roy H. Cetlin and Kenneth X. Luthy |
Hyve Solution Corporation |
In Re: Subpoena Dispute |
3:2020mc80027 |
January 31, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Thomas S Hixson |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Transferring case electronically to the Southern District of Texas. ***4:20-mc-00750*** (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2020) |
Filing 14 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson granting #13 Stipulation Granting Transfer and Modifying Scheduling Deadlines. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2020) |
Filing 13 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re Motion to Transfer filed by Roy H. Cetlin, Richard Hamilton, John Kugel, Kenneth X. Luthy, Lawrence Rougier. (Apton, Adam) (Filed on 3/3/2020) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Cherie Jean Edson (Edson, Cherie) (Filed on 3/3/2020) |
Filing 11 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson granting #10 Stipulation Modifying Scheduling Deadlines. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/21/2020) |
Set/Reset Deadlines as to #7 MOTION to Transfer, #5 MOTION to Compel. Respondent's Response due by 3/4/2020. Plaintiffs' Replies due by 3/11/2020. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/21/2020) |
Filing 10 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER filed by Roy H. Cetlin, Richard Hamilton, John Kugel, Kenneth X. Luthy, Lawrence Rougier. (Apton, Adam) (Filed on 2/20/2020) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Sharon Cohen Collier and Cherie J. Edson (Collier, Sharon) (Filed on 2/20/2020) |
Filing 4 Text entry filed in error - please disregard |
Filing 3 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson granting #1 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/4/2020) |
Filing 8 Declaration of Adam M. Apton in Support of #7 MOTION to Transfer filed by Roy H. Cetlin, Richard Hamilton, John Kugel, Kenneth X. Luthy, Lawrence Rougier. (Related document(s) #7 ) (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2020) (gbaS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 7 MOTION to Transfer filed by Roy H. Cetlin, Richard Hamilton, John Kugel, Kenneth X. Luthy, Lawrence Rougier. Responses due by 2/14/2020. Replies due by 2/21/2020. (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2020) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/6/2020: #1 Proposed Order) (gbaS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 6 Declaration of Adam M. Apton in Support of #5 MOTION to Enforce and Compel Compliance with Subpoena Duces Tecum filed by Roy H. Cetlin, Richard Hamilton, John Kugel, Kenneth X. Luthy, Lawrence Rougier. (Related document(s) #5 ) (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2020) (gbaS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 5 MOTION to Enforce and Compel Compliance with Subpoena Duces Tecum Served on Respondent Hyve Solutions Corporation with Proposed Order filed by Roy H. Cetlin, Richard Hamilton, John Kugel, Kenneth X. Luthy, Lawrence Rougier. Responses due by 2/14/2020. Replies due by 2/21/2020. (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2020) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/6/2020: #1 Proposed Order) (gbaS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 2 Declaration of Adam M. Apton in Support of #1 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed by Movant (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Related document(s) #1 ) (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2020) |
Filing 1 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed by Movants (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Filing Fee Receipt) (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2020) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.