Mai v. Pho Nation Noodle and Rice et al
Tien Van Mai |
Truong Nguyen, Pho Nation Noodle and Rice and Calvin Cao Do |
3:2021cv00375 |
January 14, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Laurel Beeler |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 NOTICE by Tien Van Mai of Settlement and Request for Dismissal with Prejudice (Tran, Huy) (Filed on 3/5/2021) |
Filing 9 CLERKS NOTICE RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE TIME. Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/15/2021 at 11:00 AM is reset to 9:30 AM in San Francisco - Videoconference Only. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/lb General Order 58. Persons gran ted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) i> (ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2021) |
Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Tien Van Mai.. (Tran, Huy) (Filed on 2/3/2021) |
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Calvin Cao Do, Truong Nguyen, Pho Nation Noodle and Rice. (arkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/15/2021) |
Filing 6 Proposed Summons. (Tran, Huy) (Filed on 1/15/2021) |
Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 4/8/2021 . Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/15/2021 11:00 AM in San Francisco, - Videoconference Only. (arkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/15/2021) |
Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 1/29/2021. (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/15/2021) |
#Electronic filing error. Summons is missing attorney information. This filing will not be processed by the clerks office.Please re-file in its entirety. Re: #3 Proposed Summons f iled by Tien Van Mai (arkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/15/2021) |
Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Tran, Huy) (Filed on 1/14/2021) |
Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet by Tien Van Mai . (Tran, Huy) (Filed on 1/14/2021) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0971-15446520.). Filed byTien Van Mai. (Tran, Huy) (Filed on 1/14/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.